GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

o2?

Old Jul 27, 2009 | 08:48 PM
  #11  
Black35thz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Default

Well I told my dad not to but he bought 4 new o2 sensors and the truck still has a missfire.I cleared the codes and parked the truck. I haven't tightened the exhaust leak yet. What do you guys think I should do next. I put new plugs in while the engine was out and dont recall breaking any porcelin?
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 11:31 PM
  #12  
black04's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 10
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Where is the exhaust leak? If its around the o2 sensor then the readings will be wrong causing it to misfire.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2009 | 02:12 PM
  #13  
Black35thz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Default

Update one plug wire was loose and one was off completley truc runs great now.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 01:08 AM
  #14  
AKlowriderZ71's Avatar
11 Second Hall Moniter
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 11,651
Likes: 10
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by hirdlej
Do what I did, I just recently got my 02 lights to shut off on my 97 work truck since the cat was plugged. What I did is got 2 spark plug non foulers HELP part #: 42002 18mm pieces



Then since 2 of them come in a pack - drill one of them out with a 9/16" bit all the way through.

They come like this:



Drill one out so it looks like this:



You'll end up with this:



Now insert your 02 sensor into the one you drilled out (remember to use antiseize on the threads)



Here should be the end product before you screw it into the bung.


Hook everything up and enjoy. I did this 2 weeks ago on my truck after yanking the cat and with 500 miles on the setup I haven't set a light yet. Good luck!
Joe, since you did this back in July, has the light come back on? Before everybody says "retune", the vehicle I'm gonna try this on isn't supported by HPT. It's a 95 Sonoma with a W-code 4.3 liter. It was brought to me after another shop couldn't make it run well. They replaced both o2 sensors and installed a 'test pipe'. I found it to have a leaking fuel injector assy inside the intake manifold as the root cause. After replacing that, a tune up(plugs were fouled), and new o2 sensors again(the new ones were clogged with soot), the truck runs great! Today it threw the cat efficiency code.

So I'm gonna try this and I'm wondering how long til the light comes back on. I read one thread where the light comes on after 900 or so miles.

Thanks Joe,
Roger
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 08:45 AM
  #15  
hirdlej's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,471
Likes: 1
From: Minneapolis, MN
Default

Roger, I have a 97 C1500 with a 4.3L Vortec just like you. The light has not come on since I've done this. I easily have 8K miles on this setup and not even once has the light tripped. Make sure you don't go too big with the drill bit though, you'll take out the threads. I forgot what size I used. Just keep stepping up with your drill press until the sensor fits in.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 11:55 AM
  #16  
budhayes3's Avatar
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by AKlowriderZ71
It's a 95 Sonoma with a W-code 4.3 liter.
Off topic, but W-code huh? I replaced a bunch of W-engines back in the late 80's early 90's...I believe that they were 3.? liters though...front wheel drive Grand Prix and/or Grand Am maybe? It's been a long time, but I remember that the block would crack in the rear corner by the head, making many techs think that it was a head gasket problem...
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 01:12 PM
  #17  
hirdlej's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,471
Likes: 1
From: Minneapolis, MN
Default

Originally Posted by budhayes3
Off topic, but W-code huh? I replaced a bunch of W-engines back in the late 80's early 90's...I believe that they were 3.? liters though...front wheel drive Grand Prix and/or Grand Am maybe? It's been a long time, but I remember that the block would crack in the rear corner by the head, making many techs think that it was a head gasket problem...
In this particular model truck they had 3 possible 4.3L's you could order. There was a TPI 4.3L that was put only in the high end 4.3L trucks (like the super sport) then a "x" variant and a "w" variant. The "x" was rated at 180HP and I believe the "w" engine was rated at either 185HP or 190HP. The only difference I was ever able to figure out years ago was the camshaft. The work trucks (C/K) and certain S10's got the W engine for stronger midrange.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 01:26 PM
  #18  
AKlowriderZ71's Avatar
11 Second Hall Moniter
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 11,651
Likes: 10
From: Wyoming
Default

For the 4.3 liter V6 used in S & T series pickups and Blazers, there were 2 different engines. Z or W. The Z-code 4.3 was throttle body fuel injected. The W-code 4.3 was CPI injected and was labeled 'Vortec'. I don't remember the hp/tq numbers, but the W engine was more powerful.

X-code came later, and was SFI injection.

I think most 4.3 liters that made it into C/K trucks were Z-code, but I'm not positive.

Joe, thanks for your response.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 03:06 PM
  #19  
hirdlej's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,471
Likes: 1
From: Minneapolis, MN
Default

Too damn many to keep straight - sorry for the 4.3L mis-info
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 03:16 PM
  #20  
AKlowriderZ71's Avatar
11 Second Hall Moniter
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 11,651
Likes: 10
From: Wyoming
Default

Not very many of us study the 4.3 liter. No worries. The only reason I know about them is that I worked for GM for so long.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 AM.