View Poll Results: What's it gonna be?
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll
Guess my RWHP/TQ POLL
Feb 9, 2007 | 03:19 PM
#12
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Thunder550 is now the proud owner of my turbo system.
Yeah, DCR will be 9.0:1. It will be on the edge but people have done as much as 9.2. If worst comes to worst i'll just put a little larger cam in it to bleed some off. Also, I still have my meth inj and might use it. I'll try out the 60lbers and see how they do. They were running fine with the turbo don't see a reason to swap them really? If the wife thought you had about 2" more than needed but it was getting the job done just fine, would you be interested in downsizing? I dunno, I may just go with the L76 intake since it already has the 90mm tb and 44lbers and get the money out of mine.
#'s referenced to a Dynojet.
Originally Posted by BADMOFO
That's a good bit of compression for pump gas isn't it? Not saying you can't run it, but I'd imagine you're gonna have to give up some timing to avoid detonation. Are you talking Dynojet or Mustang Dyno? I'd be surprised if it made 425 on a Mustang Dyno. You might want to try to sell those injectors and get something in the 44lb. range
#'s referenced to a Dynojet.
Feb 9, 2007 | 06:24 PM
#14
Originally Posted by TurboGibbs
Thunder550 is now the proud owner of my turbo system.
Yeah, DCR will be 9.0:1. It will be on the edge but people have done as much as 9.2. If worst comes to worst i'll just put a little larger cam in it to bleed some off. Also, I still have my meth inj and might use it. I'll try out the 60lbers and see how they do. They were running fine with the turbo don't see a reason to swap them really? If the wife thought you had about 2" more than needed but it was getting the job done just fine, would you be interested in downsizing? I dunno, I may just go with the L76 intake since it already has the 90mm tb and 44lbers and get the money out of mine.
#'s referenced to a Dynojet.
Yeah, DCR will be 9.0:1. It will be on the edge but people have done as much as 9.2. If worst comes to worst i'll just put a little larger cam in it to bleed some off. Also, I still have my meth inj and might use it. I'll try out the 60lbers and see how they do. They were running fine with the turbo don't see a reason to swap them really? If the wife thought you had about 2" more than needed but it was getting the job done just fine, would you be interested in downsizing? I dunno, I may just go with the L76 intake since it already has the 90mm tb and 44lbers and get the money out of mine.
#'s referenced to a Dynojet.
Called the earlier... the first pull made 518rwhp, 2nd pull made 527rwhp... they seem confident its going to hit 540-550rwhp with some more tuning.
e just put down thsoe numbers with a 402, milled L92s,L76 244/250 59x/59x 112, 11.1cr.....so im sure youll be closer to high 400s....his seutp is like mine so i should be close to his.
be totally sweet to see 530-540rwhp with a 6speed
Feb 9, 2007 | 08:05 PM
#15
Cuz I AM a BADMOFO
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,624,039
Likes: 0
From: Mission to Uranus
Originally Posted by TurboGibbs
Thunder550 is now the proud owner of my turbo system.
Yeah, DCR will be 9.0:1. It will be on the edge but people have done as much as 9.2. If worst comes to worst i'll just put a little larger cam in it to bleed some off. Also, I still have my meth inj and might use it. I'll try out the 60lbers and see how they do. They were running fine with the turbo don't see a reason to swap them really? If the wife thought you had about 2" more than needed but it was getting the job done just fine, would you be interested in downsizing? I dunno, I may just go with the L76 intake since it already has the 90mm tb and 44lbers and get the money out of mine.
#'s referenced to a Dynojet.
Yeah, DCR will be 9.0:1. It will be on the edge but people have done as much as 9.2. If worst comes to worst i'll just put a little larger cam in it to bleed some off. Also, I still have my meth inj and might use it. I'll try out the 60lbers and see how they do. They were running fine with the turbo don't see a reason to swap them really? If the wife thought you had about 2" more than needed but it was getting the job done just fine, would you be interested in downsizing? I dunno, I may just go with the L76 intake since it already has the 90mm tb and 44lbers and get the money out of mine.
#'s referenced to a Dynojet.
@ the -2"I had forgot about the 6 speed, so I'ma guessin' 450-475 now, since you're talking about a Dynojet
I think you will enjoy this set-up more than any you've had so far, and "should" have a fun daily driver which will require very little upkeep once you get the tune right. 450+rwhp w/ a six speed manual in a RCSB should be bad ***, and good for low 12's or better I would expect. Do you plan on taking it to the track?
Feb 9, 2007 | 09:40 PM
#17
Originally Posted by BADMOFO
@ the -2"I had forgot about the 6 speed, so I'ma guessin' 450-475 now, since you're talking about a Dynojet
I think you will enjoy this set-up more than any you've had so far, and "should" have a fun daily driver which will require very little upkeep once you get the tune right. 450+rwhp w/ a six speed manual in a RCSB should be bad ***, and good for low 12's or better I would expect. Do you plan on taking it to the track?
once my **** it running again
Feb 9, 2007 | 10:58 PM
#18
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
I figured the opinions would be widespread. Somewhat uncharted territory. I'm certainly interested in what will happen as are many others. That is what makes it fun is no one knows?
Yeah, it will be at the track. Banging gears and raising hell!
Yeah, it will be at the track. Banging gears and raising hell!
Feb 14, 2007 | 09:58 AM
#19
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Here is the best comparison dyno I can find to what I have on a LS2 Trailblazer SS.
Link to thread on tech
Cams appear to be very similar.
Biggest differences I can see:
-This one is automatic with converter unlocked, mine a 6 speed.
-I have about a point more compression.
-I have a carb style intake.
I don't think 450rwhp on a dynojet should be a problem do you?
Link to thread on tech
Originally Posted by Futral Motorsports
Just finished up an '06 Trailbalzer SS with a set of L92 heads.
Previous dyno: 221\224-115 cam only,stock heads
Current dyno: Bowl blended L92 w\stock valves and new cam
mods:
-Stainless works headers
-Single Magnaflow exhaust
-Cold air intake
-Yank 3600 converter
-ASP pulley
-L92 heads and intake setup
-custom cam 224\?-?
nitrous cam !
-stock gears and rims\tires
UNLOCKED numbers,but not to bad for a 224\xxx cam to start with
NOTE The dyno graph starts out low due to having to roll into the throttle and full throttle about 4600 RPM
Previous dyno: 221\224-115 cam only,stock heads
Current dyno: Bowl blended L92 w\stock valves and new cam
mods:
-Stainless works headers
-Single Magnaflow exhaust
-Cold air intake
-Yank 3600 converter
-ASP pulley
-L92 heads and intake setup
-custom cam 224\?-?
nitrous cam !-stock gears and rims\tires
UNLOCKED numbers,but not to bad for a 224\xxx cam to start with
NOTE The dyno graph starts out low due to having to roll into the throttle and full throttle about 4600 RPM
Biggest differences I can see:
-This one is automatic with converter unlocked, mine a 6 speed.
-I have about a point more compression.
-I have a carb style intake.
I don't think 450rwhp on a dynojet should be a problem do you?
