Fuel level sensor, what the dealership told me...
Nov 6, 2008 | 11:35 AM
#11
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,023
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere around -199C
Nov 7, 2008 | 12:37 PM
#12
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
From: Tucson AZ
So my fuel gauge reads 3/4 tank after every time I fill up... not a big deal to me. But I put my truck in for the gauges to be replaced under the GM warranty and asked them to check out the issues with the gas gauge.
Here is what I was told:
"The fuel level sensor is going bad, and when it finally shorts out, it is going to take out the fuel module and fuel pump with it, another $680 to repair."
Is there any truth to this? ...because I don't really care if my gas gauge is exact since I rely only my trip meter, but if it is going to mess things up later, I guess I have to replace it.
Here is what I was told:
"The fuel level sensor is going bad, and when it finally shorts out, it is going to take out the fuel module and fuel pump with it, another $680 to repair."
Is there any truth to this? ...because I don't really care if my gas gauge is exact since I rely only my trip meter, but if it is going to mess things up later, I guess I have to replace it.
But that just means I can put a cam in and not have to worry about voiding anything 
Nov 14, 2008 | 02:32 PM
#14
So my fuel gauge reads 3/4 tank after every time I fill up... not a big deal to me. But I put my truck in for the gauges to be replaced under the GM warranty and asked them to check out the issues with the gas gauge.
Here is what I was told:
"The fuel level sensor is going bad, and when it finally shorts out, it is going to take out the fuel module and fuel pump with it, another $680 to repair."
Is there any truth to this? ...because I don't really care if my gas gauge is exact since I rely only my trip meter, but if it is going to mess things up later, I guess I have to replace it.
Here is what I was told:
"The fuel level sensor is going bad, and when it finally shorts out, it is going to take out the fuel module and fuel pump with it, another $680 to repair."
Is there any truth to this? ...because I don't really care if my gas gauge is exact since I rely only my trip meter, but if it is going to mess things up later, I guess I have to replace it.
Advisors never listen....
Nov 17, 2008 | 07:53 AM
#16
TECH Addict
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 0
From: In the Sticks of Virginia
The failure of the fuel lever sensor is commonplace here with GM. The Engineers claim it to tbe a build up of carbon and other additives in the gasoline, and that it will cause the fuel level sensor to stick. It's basically a resistance potentiometer with a float arm. But the GM Technical Bulletin reccomends the usage of a Fuel System Treatment. The GM Part number on the Treatment is 88861011. The treatment DOES contain Teflon. So the Teflon coats the sensor and keeps it working properly.
While I have had some sucess in resurecting failed fuel level sensors with this treatment, the pass/fail rating is about 60/40.
While I have had some sucess in resurecting failed fuel level sensors with this treatment, the pass/fail rating is about 60/40.
Nov 17, 2008 | 08:36 AM
#18
Nov 17, 2008 | 09:04 AM
#19
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,836
Likes: 5
From: Houston, Texas
The failure of the fuel lever sensor is commonplace here with GM. The Engineers claim it to tbe a build up of carbon and other additives in the gasoline, and that it will cause the fuel level sensor to stick. It's basically a resistance potentiometer with a float arm. But the GM Technical Bulletin reccomends the usage of a Fuel System Treatment. The GM Part number on the Treatment is 88861011. The treatment DOES contain Teflon. So the Teflon coats the sensor and keeps it working properly.
While I have had some sucess in resurecting failed fuel level sensors with this treatment, the pass/fail rating is about 60/40.
While I have had some sucess in resurecting failed fuel level sensors with this treatment, the pass/fail rating is about 60/40.
Nov 17, 2008 | 10:48 AM
#20
TECH Addict
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 0
From: In the Sticks of Virginia
lol...well yeah...they aren't going to Cowboy up and say..."hey, we f'd up and made a shitty part". For some reason they can't over-engineer the part to withstand years of being submersed in carbon ricg fuel that will "gum-up" after awhile.
I know what you mean though.....I think I can design better parts than some that are out there, but I still have to say there are alot more benefits to using OEM parts over the aftermarket.....in most cases.
I mean...you know of course that if me and Dewmansu "Dewy" sat around a table with a supply of cold Corona, and got paid to design parts.......then our **** would never break....lol....!!!!!
