GM Parts Classifieds For Sale and Wanted

210/216, .532"/.532", 110*

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 7, 2009 | 08:31 AM
  #11  
ou812sm's Avatar
TECH Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 434
Likes: 1
From: new bedford mass.
Default

how would this cam work in a 4.8 with 4.56 gears 34 inch tires and eventually a 3000 stall from yank can you im me thank you
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2009 | 02:40 AM
  #12  
stock48's Avatar
Thread Starter
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 5
From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by ou812sm
how would this cam work in a 4.8 with 4.56 gears 34 inch tires and eventually a 3000 stall from yank can you im me thank you
I think it would work well due to the short 254*/260* @.006'' That 210 lobe has the same .200'' number as the comp 212 lobe with a shorter* @.006". That means it's going to come off the bottom harder and still make good power up top. I definatly wouldn't go much more cam on that application.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2009 | 06:01 AM
  #13  
04herod's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: spiro ok
Default

is that cam and lifters. and i have a 4.8 will b running 373s with a 26in tire and a 2800 stall not 2 up 2date on much of this stuff just gettin into it all. how do u think it would work 4 me. o and i also have shorties no cats an duel aeroturbines.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2009 | 06:12 AM
  #14  
stock48's Avatar
Thread Starter
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 5
From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Default

Would work well for that application as well. On hyd RR engines the factory lifters are reused. Good performance cam for a 4.8. Rpm range will be 3~500Rpm higher than a 5.3.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2009 | 09:51 PM
  #15  
stock48's Avatar
Thread Starter
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 5
From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Default

Reply
Old Nov 8, 2009 | 11:31 PM
  #16  
SincalT/A's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 0
From: Currently In suspense.
Default

Just to let you 4.8 guys know my cam is a custom 212 218 531 531 114(Almost exact same #'s as crane low lift just couple degrees diffrence on valve events).I ran it on stock manifolds and made more power everywhere in the rpm band went to long tubes picked up bout 30rwhp.Then went blower and haven't thought twice to change it.Point is that cam should work well for many applications with a nice subtle lope.Also looks like it will allow for 1.8 rocker if you wanted alittle more out of it.

Last edited by SincalT/A; Nov 8, 2009 at 11:43 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 05:06 PM
  #17  
stock48's Avatar
Thread Starter
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 5
From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by SincalT/A
Just to let you 4.8 guys know my cam is a custom 212 218 531 531 114(Almost exact same #'s as crane low lift just couple degrees diffrence on valve events).I ran it on stock manifolds and made more power everywhere in the rpm band went to long tubes picked up bout 30rwhp.Then went blower and haven't thought twice to change it.Point is that cam should work well for many applications with a nice subtle lope.Also looks like it will allow for 1.8 rocker if you wanted alittle more out of it.
Sounds like a good setup. I like the 114 for the blower.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 05:13 PM
  #18  
ChevyTruck's Avatar
something else
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Default

Originally Posted by Tootall
those are nice cams for trucks with big tires . . .
Why do you say that Matt? Is it due to the wide range of tq?

Maybe do this while my LQ is being built...
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 12:47 AM
  #19  
stock48's Avatar
Thread Starter
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 5
From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by chevytruck
Why do you say that Matt? Is it due to the wide range of tq?

Maybe do this while my LQ is being built...
If you buy this cam, and don't like it Il buy it back.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 06:19 AM
  #20  
Tootall's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (79)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,175
Likes: 1
From: League City, Tx
Default

Originally Posted by chevytruck
Why do you say that Matt? Is it due to the wide range of tq?

Maybe do this while my LQ is being built...
less duration, less lift vs the bigger cams . . . off idle power vs like a light switch at higher RPMs

meaning the power comes on sooner, and the 110 moves the power band lower

this cam is really close to the 212 218 522 529 -114 . . . <<-- and those cams are great for lifted or stock stalled trucks.

it has more lift, with less duration
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 AM.