How much did the stock springs rate? I wouldnt think more than 105 pounds of seat pressure. I could be wrong though. With that kind of lift i would think much more would be needed to keep the valve in correct rate

 

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"> I just finished dynoing a new 01 5.3 truck on my dynojet 248 chassis dyno.

Mostly stock with some bolt ons.

261 RWHP before cam
297 RWHP with 02 z06 cam
(stock springs, retainers,pushrods etc (didnt change any valvetrain, i checked for coil bind and there is none)
311 RWHP Removed serpentine belts </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Is he going to go to the track? Do you know what times he ran before the cam? I would like to see how much his times changed from the swap.

 

Before the cam, truck ran a 14.3 @ 100 (standard cab, stepside, lowered). It has a throttle body spacer, catback exhaust, air filter, hypertech programmer

No times on the 150 shot n20 kit or with the cam yet.

On nitrous we dynoed, 435 rwhp.

 

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by 2000 Sportside:
<strong> Is this the Z06 Cam at SDPC for 185.00.I wonder what it would do in a 4.8.Any Ideas <img border="0" alt="[burn out]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_burnout.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yeah, I have a 4.8 and I'm looking for a reasonably priced cam. Can someone share their thoughts? <img border="0" alt="[worship]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_hail.gif" />

 

14.3 @ 100 with those mods <img border="0" alt="[bullshit]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_bs.gif" />

 

Hyde jump in here man. If am am running in the 12.7-ish range with my 175 shot before the cam and this guy is running that with only that what am I doing wrong here man? <img border="0" alt="[bullshit]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_bs.gif" />

 

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by LOTSOFN:
<strong> 14.3 @ 100 with those mods <img border="0" alt="[bullshit]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_bs.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">14.3 could be seen. He doesn't say what gears or tires he used. BUT the 100 MPH is <img border="0" alt="[bullshit]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_bs.gif" /> . I was at 14.3-14.4 before the Yank with 3.42s and BFG DRs, but it was nowhere near 100 mph....more like 92-93.

<small>[ March 21, 2003, 11:11 AM: Message edited by: red53gmc ]</small>

 

TTT

 

261rwhp ? good bolt-on's! 14.3 @ 100 ? That s.cal.smog must burn good.Being below sealevel must be nice at the track.Here in memphis you
might run 14.3 after the cam. Good # though <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" /> JIM