GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Are you happy with your bolted 5.3? This is a open topic check it.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 24, 2010 | 07:06 PM
  #31  
sand man's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
From: Saudi Arabia
Default

i drove a 5.7 tundra , a new nissan patrol with a 5.6 320hp/380tq i really liked the lunch of them two they are pretty fast from 0-60
althogh the patrol had a taller first gear than my crew cab 5.3 6l80 3.42..it held sides with my truck from 0 to to 50 then i walked over him by 8 car lenghts at 120-130 mph

my mods in the sig and having 300whp aginst a stock 5.6 setting in a heaver SUV i was mad about my tq

next mod UDP

would sure like a cam or a 6.0 swap
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2010 | 07:44 PM
  #32  
Bumpers's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 0
From: Tupelo Ms
Default

Next truck will be boosted not built to run on motor
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2010 | 09:11 AM
  #33  
Rhino79's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 1
From: Cabot, AR
Default

Less cubes = less torque. I used to run a 355 sbc in my 66 pickup, I had a buddy that had the same truck, with a 327. Similar mods, and I would walk him 3-4 cars from a dig but from a roll the lil 327 would hang.

You can blame the lack of lowend torque on several things. First off the bore is much smaller than a sbc. The heads are designed to flow big air in the mid to upper rpms. Sbc heads didn't but that had small ports for great velocity which made them very torquey. The TBI engines had swirl ports, that made them super torquey but flowed up top like ****. The older engines had cams designed for the shitty heads, flat tappet, low lift low duration on a much more narrow lsa, the power cam in sooner but on a stock sbc was usually done at about 4500-5000 rpms. The newer vehicles are heavier,harder to get moving.

I'll settle for the lack of instant torque in exhange for killer top end power, I'll just run a bigger converter! lol
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2010 | 10:36 AM
  #34  
rel3rd's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 4
From: Baltimore, MD.
Default

Originally Posted by Rhino79
Less cubes = less torque.

I'll settle for the lack of instant torque in exhange for killer top end power, I'll just run a bigger converter! lol
or a 50 shot...

Pretty much spot on in your description of differences. Local guy near me can whoop me in his old 71 or so 400 small block powered C10, for about 100 feet or so, then gets to see the little 323 going by him like his **** just broke...lol.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2010 | 01:16 AM
  #35  
Naf's Avatar
Naf
Launching!
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 226
Likes: 1
From: Sandbox, Kuwait
Default

Oh my, i just got a 6.0 SSR intake, ported it, also got a 90mm LS2 TB, and just for fun i complimented them with LS6 heads, LS6 Cam, headers and an escalade exhaust for more bottom torque and top HP...

Extremely fast off the line and the engine never seems to run out of pin you in your seat
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2010 | 07:12 AM
  #36  
THE-HOE's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 532
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh
Default

So true what everyone is talking about here. The day I got my turbo on i was already thinking about what heads to get. Ugh, i think we all need rehab classes.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2010 | 11:03 PM
  #37  
sleeperlqx's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Default

yes i agree. I have the need to wana run everyone. If the wallet had no limit, it still would never stop. swaped to a vmax 6.0 from my 5.3, still thinking of swaping a 6.2 camed, with lt headers, v8 mod, and dyno tune. I was told to just stick with what I have, and make more power and tq than the 6.2. I have a SC planed for the future, and want to get a 2300tvs just cause I know my hunger.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2010 | 03:36 PM
  #38  
Whitelightin2005's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Default

Whats a good cam choice for a low to midrange power in the 5.3 with no stall?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
5.3Okasai
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
15
Mar 9, 2022 01:07 PM
steves86ta
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
Jul 28, 2015 10:21 AM
08nali
TOWING & OFFROAD PERFORMANCE
0
Jul 23, 2015 11:39 PM
GM1697
WTB (Wanted To Buy)
0
Jul 9, 2015 01:55 PM
GreyChevy
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
1
Jul 7, 2015 08:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:58 PM.