XR265HR in a 5.3 dyno graph and thoughts
#61
#62
#63
See, I try to act like I know what I'm talking about and this happens. I thought there was some adjustable pushrod. Thanks for edjumacating me Billy. I'm guessing I should just go with Comp's pushrods, Comp PART #7955-16.
#64
#66
#67
NicD, I installed the same cam on my '06 5.3 over the weekend. You told me before you set your shift points at 6300rpms, is that for all the gears?
Also, I've read mixed comments on removing the cats, some say removing them hurt lowend. Did you removed them? I'd love to see real info on cats vs no cats on the lowend.
Thanks
Also, I've read mixed comments on removing the cats, some say removing them hurt lowend. Did you removed them? I'd love to see real info on cats vs no cats on the lowend.
Thanks
I didn't do any back to back tests with and without cats on my truck but I have never seen a loss of low end on any car by removing the cats.
#69
I think it would work as well as any other mild cam. The powerband is nice and really brings up the top RPM area to be on a level playing field with the torque so it would be a good balance IMO for a turbo or blower. It doesn't have a ton of overlap either.
#70
Teching In
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Outside of Birmingham, the only one that counts
NicD,
Tell me about your intake. I have an "01 CCSB HD 4X4 6.0 that curbs right above 6000# and I cannot lose any bottom end even with 4.10's and stock 31 inch tires.
Can you point me to good information to help me learn more about the LS intake and their characteristics?
Thanks in Advance,
Ronnie
Tell me about your intake. I have an "01 CCSB HD 4X4 6.0 that curbs right above 6000# and I cannot lose any bottom end even with 4.10's and stock 31 inch tires.
Can you point me to good information to help me learn more about the LS intake and their characteristics?
Thanks in Advance,
Ronnie


