XR265 vs XR259 in a 5.3L
#11
Do you have the actual dyno run files that you could post? Do you have the graph over RPM instead of speed? I guess i could calculate the peaks with a calculator if you could post your rear tire height. Assuming a 29.5" tall tire it looks like peak torque around 4100 rpm and peak HP at 5800 rpm but the graph doesn't go far enough to get a good picture of what happens after that. Heck it may still be going up slightly.
#15
heres a pdf of a bunch of their cams for these motors
http://www.compcams.com/technical/Ca...07/172-175.pdf
http://www.compcams.com/technical/Ca...07/172-175.pdf
#16
54-408-11 XR259HR 259/265 advertised 206/212 @ .050 .515/.522 112° LSA
54-412-11 XR265HR 265/271 advertised 212/218 @ .050 .522/.529 114° LSA
The hi-lift version of the 265 that I didn't list above looks to be a disaster for a 5.3L and isn't even that great on a 5.7L-6.0L motor.
54-412-11 XR265HR 265/271 advertised 212/218 @ .050 .522/.529 114° LSA
The hi-lift version of the 265 that I didn't list above looks to be a disaster for a 5.3L and isn't even that great on a 5.7L-6.0L motor.
#17
I have that book, aswell as a couple of others- but there's no mention of the 259 in there. COnsidering that the book covers mostly LS1 on up this is understandable...............
#18
heres a pdf of a bunch of their cams for these motors
http://www.compcams.com/technical/Ca...07/172-175.pdf
http://www.compcams.com/technical/Ca...07/172-175.pdf
Originally Posted by NicD
54-408-11 XR259HR 259/265 advertised 206/212 @ .050 .515/.522 112° LSA
54-412-11 XR265HR 265/271 advertised 212/218 @ .050 .522/.529 114° LSA
54-412-11 XR265HR 265/271 advertised 212/218 @ .050 .522/.529 114° LSA
I should be familiar with that first grind lol
#20


