Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Who here knows something about the 5.3's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-09-2009, 12:08 PM
  #11  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (37)
 
taws6m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: northwest La
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

damn, I get plent of responses here. I will be looking for a lm7 specifically cause I want the dished pistons. I will be swapping heads, so no concern with those. different camshaft springs and rods. I just thought I read somewhere the 03+ model lm7's had better internals(not sure what though). I did read the wiki link posted above last night, lots of info. I am just looking for something that says about internals mainly (ie. the 03 models had upgraded connecting rods or rod bolts whatever) So I know what year model I should be shooting for. Thanks, lots of help so far, keep it coming also DOD is displacement on demand correct? I am guessing it won't matter if I get one of these lm7's with this will it? That's just all electronics, I can just ditch it and do what I want I assume

Last edited by taws6m6; 08-09-2009 at 12:14 PM.
Old 08-09-2009, 12:13 PM
  #12  
I have a gauge for that
iTrader: (42)
 
Atomic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 16,252
Received 374 Likes on 255 Posts
Default

The 04+ LQ4s (6.0s) had stronger internals, but I dont think that applies to the 5.3s.
Old 08-09-2009, 12:25 PM
  #13  
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
budhayes3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Atomic
The 04+ LQ4s (6.0s) had stronger internals, but I dont think that applies to the 5.3s.
I thought it was 05+ that got the LQ9 internals...haven't heard anything about upgraded 5.3 internals though...
Old 08-09-2009, 05:39 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
therock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 30 Miles North of Atlanta
Posts: 1,719
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

The L33 do not forget has the LS6 heads. A tiny bit more cam too. Mine loves the Radix. It got the coated piston skirts and the floating wrist pins and is a silent running motor even when cold.
It's also 100 lbs lighter in full trim compared to the LM7. A wash with the 80+lbs of the Radix kit.

But if you gotta have dished.

Old 08-09-2009, 10:57 PM
  #15  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (37)
 
taws6m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: northwest La
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok, so I should just shoot for the newest/lowest mileage lm7 I can find. Seems there are no differences between the years
Old 08-10-2009, 05:18 PM
  #16  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (37)
 
taws6m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: northwest La
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

bump for the last few questions
Old 08-10-2009, 05:53 PM
  #17  
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
trever1t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yes! look for the best deal you can find on a low mile engine. If you are going to do a full tear down/ rebuild it doesn't matter.
Old 08-22-2009, 01:24 AM
  #18  
On The Tree
 
s10_onbagz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: BKCT
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 95 bright teal
Oh I knew the l33 was better for boost and Assumed it was due to lower compression. So do they not respond as well to turbo applications?
Higher compression is better for boost. It requires less pressure to achieve the same final compression, and is more fun to drive around town. Turbo's do not spool at low to mid throttle, so when you run more compression the vehicle will be less of a dog in the lower throttle driving. Higher compression also makes the turbo spool faster.
Old 08-23-2009, 08:04 AM
  #19  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
SweetS10V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by s10_onbagz
Higher compression is better for boost.
Not according to everything Ive ever been taught or read about.

Airflow(good heads/intake/exhaust) is better because then it requires less boost to make the same power. Id rather run 4-5 PSI than 8-10psi if both options netted me the same power.
Old 10-24-2009, 05:27 PM
  #20  
Staging Lane
 
snow white's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by s10_onbagz
Higher compression is better for boost. It requires less pressure to achieve the same final compression, and is more fun to drive around town. Turbo's do not spool at low to mid throttle, so when you run more compression the vehicle will be less of a dog in the lower throttle driving. Higher compression also makes the turbo spool faster.
i agree with this statement. thats how i'm building my L33, 10.4:1 @ 8psi is the same as running 9:1 at 12psi


Quick Reply: Who here knows something about the 5.3's?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 AM.