GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

What would this cam do??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 18, 2003 | 01:26 PM
  #1  
2000SSilver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default What would this cam do??

I will have lots of mods, intake, fans, LT's, 4:10's, exhaust, etc and was wondering what kind of gains, hp and tq, I would expect to see from this cam: 212/218, 558/563, 115lsa. I have a 5.3 and will keep the heads stock. I know I have to replace the springs. Would I need a stall? This is my daily driver and I don't tow anything. I wouldn't expect any idling issues with the 115lsa and a stock tune, right? I will eventually have a custom or Preditor tune. All opinions appreciated. Thanks
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2003 | 01:56 PM
  #2  
BigTex's Avatar
? ? ? ? ? ?
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,126
Likes: 2
From: East of Dallas
Default

I personally like that cam. Should idle OK, make pretty good power, keep some low end, really bump power in the upper rpms.... A stall wouldn't hutrt, but not necessary.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2003 | 08:21 PM
  #3  
67SS509's Avatar
10 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 812
Likes: 2
From: Whiteville, NC
Default

Installed this cam in my 6.0 last week. Bumped the idle up 50 rpm to make it idle just like stock. Bottom end is the same (w/3000 conv.) but out pulls stock cam 4500 to 6000. . May go 6100 or 6200 in your 5.3. My guess is about a 30 hp increase. Trick to buying this cam is to custom order it (same price) with 1.450" base circle. The off the shelf ones have a 1.490" base and will cause you to give up approx. .030" of your valve lash. With the 1.450" base and .050" longer push rods you keep the geometry the same as stock. Your stock cam should have a base of approx. 1.550".
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2003 | 12:49 AM
  #4  
2000SSilver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

Thanks for the above two replies!! Now I would like to know the performance differences between the 212/218, 558/563, 115lsa and the 212/218, 522/529, 114lsa. Which one would be better for my set-up? I've read about some people here making huge gains with the smaller lift cam. Is that because of the lower lsa? Thanks again.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2003 | 05:08 PM
  #5  
67SS509's Avatar
10 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 812
Likes: 2
From: Whiteville, NC
Default

The second cam you mention will peak torque and horsepower a little sooner and probably will not quite pull to 6000. You can live with it but probably will need LS1edit to get a satisfactory idle.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2500ZL1
8-Lug Truck Performance
60
Jan 25, 2016 06:30 AM
lawhitediamante
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
5
Aug 12, 2015 12:14 PM
steves86ta
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
Jul 28, 2015 10:21 AM
WICK3DxGATA
FORCED INDUCTION
4
Jul 21, 2015 06:59 PM
projectnightcrawler
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
Jul 19, 2015 11:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 PM.