UPD vs K&N (FIPK)
Dec 18, 2002 | 08:52 PM
#11
Re: UPD vs K&N (FIPK)
OK here goes:
Dyno-K&N FIPK
~45*
255rwhp/262rwtq
Dyno-UPD
~55*
261rwhp/271rwtq
No other mods between the dyno runs and the temp was higher on the UPD. 6rwhp/9rwtq......UPD nuff said.
Dyno-K&N FIPK
~45*
255rwhp/262rwtq
Dyno-UPD
~55*
261rwhp/271rwtq
No other mods between the dyno runs and the temp was higher on the UPD. 6rwhp/9rwtq......UPD nuff said.
Dec 18, 2002 | 08:58 PM
#13
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: PASADENA,TX
Re: UPD vs K&N (FIPK)
Praise GOD!!! <img border="0" alt="[hail]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_hail.gif" />
Dec 18, 2002 | 10:45 PM
#15
TECH Resident
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 918
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Re: UPD vs K&N (FIPK)
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by BadBlackZ:
<strong>like i said, my opinion, no need to get your panties in a wad over it. just because my opinion does not reflect yours, no need to quote what i said and strike back directly at them.
thank you, drive through</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Who's striking back? Just stating my opinion.
<strong>like i said, my opinion, no need to get your panties in a wad over it. just because my opinion does not reflect yours, no need to quote what i said and strike back directly at them.
thank you, drive through</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Who's striking back? Just stating my opinion.
Dec 18, 2002 | 10:48 PM
#16
TECH Resident
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 918
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Re: UPD vs K&N (FIPK)
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by MR.MIX:
<strong>Why hello Mr. Bash. WTF is wrong with someone having an opinion.I seriously doubt that you can even prove which one is better.I really think he was asking peoples opinion anyway. As far as intakes I have the K&N and have had no problems with it.I can't complement on the UPD because I have never owned one.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I have in no way said, or proven which is better. I was merely stating my opinion b/c badblack was bashing the K&N.
<strong>Why hello Mr. Bash. WTF is wrong with someone having an opinion.I seriously doubt that you can even prove which one is better.I really think he was asking peoples opinion anyway. As far as intakes I have the K&N and have had no problems with it.I can't complement on the UPD because I have never owned one.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I have in no way said, or proven which is better. I was merely stating my opinion b/c badblack was bashing the K&N.
Dec 18, 2002 | 10:52 PM
#17
TECH Resident
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 918
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Re: UPD vs K&N (FIPK)
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Fast4.8:
<strong>OK here goes:
Dyno-K&N FIPK
~45*
255rwhp/262rwtq
Dyno-UPD
~55*
261rwhp/271rwtq
No other mods between the dyno runs and the temp was higher on the UPD. 6rwhp/9rwtq......UPD nuff said.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Was this on the same day? It doesn't look like it due to the temps. Different days could account for different dyno #'s, so could bad gas. Was it a clean K&N or dirty? Clean or dirty UPD? In no way am I bashing, just letting the guy at the top hear everything. I don't think there is really enough difference in the two to worry about, so either one works fine.
<small>[ December 18, 2002, 10:53 PM: Message edited by: red53gmc ]</small>
<strong>OK here goes:
Dyno-K&N FIPK
~45*
255rwhp/262rwtq
Dyno-UPD
~55*
261rwhp/271rwtq
No other mods between the dyno runs and the temp was higher on the UPD. 6rwhp/9rwtq......UPD nuff said.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Was this on the same day? It doesn't look like it due to the temps. Different days could account for different dyno #'s, so could bad gas. Was it a clean K&N or dirty? Clean or dirty UPD? In no way am I bashing, just letting the guy at the top hear everything. I don't think there is really enough difference in the two to worry about, so either one works fine.
<small>[ December 18, 2002, 10:53 PM: Message edited by: red53gmc ]</small>
Dec 18, 2002 | 11:44 PM
#18
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
From: CLARKSVILLE,TN
Re: UPD vs K&N (FIPK)
My K&N style intake always gets dripping, sopping wet every time I go to the car wash or drive in the rain. All the water goes right over and around the headlight and slams right into it. I personally don't care for it. So my vote, UPD... <img border="0" alt="[judgement]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_judge.gif" />
Dec 19, 2002 | 12:14 AM
#19
Re: UPD vs K&N (FIPK)
hey fucknuts,
I wasnt bashing the k&n, ****, i paid the $230 some odd dollars for the damn thing, and i liked it. then i got a UPD and i liked it better.
your comments just screwed this honest thread all to hell just because you wanted to state what you call your opinion. all you had to say is i have a K&N and i like it. end of story.
I wasnt bashing the k&n, ****, i paid the $230 some odd dollars for the damn thing, and i liked it. then i got a UPD and i liked it better.
your comments just screwed this honest thread all to hell just because you wanted to state what you call your opinion. all you had to say is i have a K&N and i like it. end of story.
Dec 19, 2002 | 08:00 AM
#20
TECH Addict
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
From: fayetteville AR
Re: UPD vs K&N (FIPK)
red4.3gmc- pull your head out. Put the magazines away and quit acting like you know things.