GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Too much??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 25, 2005 | 09:09 PM
  #11  
SCIV's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Round Rock, Texas
Default

I have no idea about reverse split. 224 not a 234...

Will the 112 LSA mess with emissions? I totally forgot about that part
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2005 | 09:29 PM
  #12  
white1's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,230
Likes: 5
From: Sittin on jackstands
Default

I had Cam motion speck out a cam for my 6.0, I'll tell you, its close to a TR224, and I'd go with a 112 lsa for better low end, and possinly advance the timing 4*
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2005 | 09:32 PM
  #13  
Kano's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: Winston Salem NC
Default

the cam you posted up in the 1st thread was a 234 228 right?

Id look into the futral line
seems like the 114 would be better if emmisions is an issue
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2005 | 09:42 PM
  #14  
SCIV's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Round Rock, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by gamedawgx53
the cam you posted up in the 1st thread was a 234 228 right?
I forgot about the SLP cam info since everyone talked more about the TR cam. Sorry about that.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2005 | 09:44 PM
  #15  
SCIV's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Round Rock, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by white1
I had Cam motion speck out a cam for my 6.0, I'll tell you, its close to a TR224, and I'd go with a 112 lsa for better low end,
I think I am getting closer to this being my choice.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2005 | 09:44 PM
  #16  
Rhino79's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 1
From: Cabot, AR
Default

Originally Posted by 99Silver5.3
In a 6.0 he might be ok with the TB. Its gonna stall higher than it would behind a 5.3. Plus that cam in a 6.0 will act smaller than in a 5.3.

That's true, more torque, more stall.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2005 | 10:03 PM
  #17  
FarmerBeau's Avatar
Sexy Party Mod
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,429
Likes: 0
From: Spring, Texas
Default

I dont mean to steal this thread but will you tell me what a reverse splitt is. I saw this on a site and was like wtf. thanks
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2005 | 06:37 AM
  #18  
Kano's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: Winston Salem NC
Default

Originally Posted by FarmerBeau
I dont mean to steal this thread but will you tell me what a reverse splitt is. I saw this on a site and was like wtf. thanks
where the intake duration is larger than the exhaust
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2005 | 06:43 AM
  #19  
1slow01Z71's Avatar
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

224/228 112lsa
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2005 | 05:15 PM
  #20  
Tractionless's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
From: Edinburg, TX
Default

Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
224/228 112lsa
Thats the one I wanna go with but on a 114lsa w/ the XE Hi Lift.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:30 AM.