Terry....truck ideas>>
#1
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
From: as far away from Koonerville as humanly possible
http://www.slammed98gmc.com/
He ran a 12.59 with the mighty 4.3L & n20.
If I remember correctly, the V6 bottom end was stock, but he had:
cam
roller rockers
headers
pulley(s)
misc. bolt-ons
He ran a 12.59 with the mighty 4.3L & n20.
If I remember correctly, the V6 bottom end was stock, but he had:
cam
roller rockers
headers
pulley(s)
misc. bolt-ons
#2
Thats a nice looking truck! FYI, Chris at MTI sprayed the hell out of his 4.3L Sonoma and I believe it ran high 12s on slicks. The engine never blew, and he sprayed the crap out of it.
Tony
Tony
#5
Adkoonerstrator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 21,436
Likes: 3
From: Deep in the seedy underworld of Koonerville
Thats what I've been saying. Spray it!!!
You don't want to waste ANY bottom end torque turning a centrifugal charger with that motor. <img border="0" alt="[judgement]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_judge.gif" /> You'd have to leave the damn thing in second gear just to get some rpms/boost to tow your trailer at 50-60mph. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
You should make a stroker motor for it. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> The only problem is the stroker crank for those 4.3L cost more than one for a LS1. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" />
Why not a 150 shot? The motor is still new, it should <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> be able to take it. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
John
<small>[ July 01, 2002, 02:44 PM: Message edited by: XLR8NSS ]</small>
You don't want to waste ANY bottom end torque turning a centrifugal charger with that motor. <img border="0" alt="[judgement]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_judge.gif" /> You'd have to leave the damn thing in second gear just to get some rpms/boost to tow your trailer at 50-60mph. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
You should make a stroker motor for it. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> The only problem is the stroker crank for those 4.3L cost more than one for a LS1. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" />
Why not a 150 shot? The motor is still new, it should <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> be able to take it. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
John
<small>[ July 01, 2002, 02:44 PM: Message edited by: XLR8NSS ]</small>
#6
A 150 might be a bit much. How about a 100 shot (52N), and 28" ET streets? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
I'm sure I could get in the low 13s that way, with a few other small mods. I lose the sleeper effect though with the ET streets...
I'm sure I could get in the low 13s that way, with a few other small mods. I lose the sleeper effect though with the ET streets...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
calsdad
8-Lug Truck Performance
34
Jun 14, 2023 11:07 PM
BROKE-aSS-BLAZER
GM Parts Classifieds
7
Oct 13, 2017 03:50 PM
Wrecker 426
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
1
Sep 30, 2015 09:39 PM
Cammed4ever
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
Sep 30, 2015 03:38 PM



