GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Stainless Work Headers

Old Sep 8, 2006 | 08:25 PM
  #1  
04GIBBS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
From: Glen Burnie, MD
Default Stainless Work Headers

I got the headers put on today and DAMN what a difference

At partial throttle the tires are up in smoke Damn what a good.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 08:35 PM
  #2  
NeverSatisfied02's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,135
Likes: 0
From: Friendswood, TX
Default

How much do they run?

How do they compare to the pacesetters?
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 10:19 PM
  #3  
budhayes3's Avatar
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

I love mine

http://www.stainlessworks.net/cart/i...82_258_265_362
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 10:51 PM
  #4  
NeverSatisfied02's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,135
Likes: 0
From: Friendswood, TX
Default

Are these better than the pacesetters? Never heard of them before but they are more expensive
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 04:34 AM
  #5  
04GIBBS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
From: Glen Burnie, MD
Default Headers

Average price is close to $900.

They are better than the pacesetters.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 09:42 AM
  #6  
02sierraz71_5.3's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 1
From: Cornelius, NC
Default

Originally Posted by 04GIBBS
Average price is close to $900.

They are better than the pacesetters.
I thought it was better dyno numbers=better headers, Ive had it confused all along its not horsepower its money that makes it better.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 09:51 AM
  #7  
moregrip's Avatar
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by 02sierraz71_5.3
I thought it was better dyno numbers=better headers, Ive had it confused all along its not horsepower its money that makes it better.
materials are better, I prefer the collector on the pacesetters though, and then again kooks collectors, however the latest headers I've seen from SW look like they revised them, at least for the TBSS/SSR application.

Last edited by moregrip; Sep 11, 2006 at 09:58 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 09:59 AM
  #8  
bluecajun5.3's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,861
Likes: 0
From: Breaux Bridge, LA
Default

Originally Posted by 02sierraz71_5.3
I thought it was better dyno numbers=better headers, Ive had it confused all along its not horsepower its money that makes it better.
i'll stick with my $300 pacesetters
i think they're doing the job.

good deal though gibbs, they look good and well made.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 04:54 PM
  #9  
04GIBBS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
From: Glen Burnie, MD
Default headers

I appreciate that, you can tell a little of the torque is gone but mid to top end is just awesome
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 04:42 PM
  #10  
DamnYankee's Avatar
formerly Moze (2/24/2012)
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: Mesquite, TX
Default

Originally Posted by moregrip
materials are better, I prefer the collector on the pacesetters though, and then again kooks collectors, however the latest headers I've seen from SW look like they revised them, at least for the TBSS/SSR application.

Agreed. That collector on the SW's suck.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:00 PM.