GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Running hot....maybe?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 03:59 PM
  #1  
bgray's Avatar
Thread Starter
TOTM: June 2007
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 7
From: Hamilton, Ontario
Default Running hot....maybe?

hey guys...hashing things out on the dyno today, and with my 99 5.3 with Dual flexalites on it, the temps got to 202 degree coolant temeparature....

Would it help if i bought a 160 thermostat? Mt tuner seems to think so, but i remeber someone saying these trucks like to run hot..is this any different
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 04:10 PM
  #2  
RandomHero's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 1
From: Austin,TX Name:Mark
Default

it will help a bit but keep in mind you'll lose gas mileage. My truck runs at 198 with the stock fan and I get 20.5 mpg, just FYI.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 05:36 PM
  #3  
03sierraslt's Avatar
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,007
Likes: 221
From: Western PA
Default

I would consider that normal, mine runs at 192 on the highway. In traffic it will hit 200, this is when I have my fans set to come on. I rarely hear the fans kick on. It takes mine a while to get to 200 when sitting still.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 08:38 PM
  #4  
budhayes3's Avatar
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

202* is normal with the factory thermo...I used to see 202-203* with the stock thermostat and factory clutch fan in the summer after beating on it.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 10:48 PM
  #5  
truckmann's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,894
Likes: 0
From: OK
Default

I'm with them. 202 on the dyno isn't bad. Mine runs around 198 and I am happy.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 10:52 PM
  #6  
gmforlife's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

If you run a 160 stat it will actually run at around 170/180ish, the stock thermo is a 186, that's what it says on the actual thermostat, and obviously stock thermo's run at 200 or so. So technically a 160 stat isn't 160, FYI
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 06:29 AM
  #7  
bgray's Avatar
Thread Starter
TOTM: June 2007
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 7
From: Hamilton, Ontario
Default

okay..so really..this isnt anything outta the norm then. I'll leav eit be and save my mpg
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2007 | 05:21 PM
  #8  
99LoweredSierra's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default

You shouldnt lose mileage if its tuned for it. I got mine tuned for it!
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2007 | 05:26 PM
  #9  
RandomHero's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 1
From: Austin,TX Name:Mark
Default

Originally Posted by 99LoweredSierra
You shouldnt lose mileage if its tuned for it. I got mine tuned for it!
I've heard differently. I have no personal experience but I've heard from at least 5 people who have the 160* stat and tuned for it and they lost a full 1 mpg.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2007 | 07:24 PM
  #10  
gmforlife's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by RandomHero
I've heard differently. I have no personal experience but I've heard from at least 5 people who have the 160* stat and tuned for it and they lost a full 1 mpg.
Well with the lower engine temp you can add like 1 more degree of timing, but i don't know about losing 1mpg, might or might not. I think if it were me i wouldn't give a crap cause i get shitty mileage anyway, what's 1mpg less to me? Nothing!!!!!!!!!
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 AM.