Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Is roots style that much better than centrifugal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-2003, 08:21 AM
  #11  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Smoky02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Navarre, FL
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Is roots style that much better than centrifugal

haven't really heard that much about powerdyne, but the price is a little higher than procharger with not as many goodies
Old 09-15-2003, 06:37 PM
  #12  
TECH Resident
 
MNC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is roots style that much better than centrifugal

Better, roots makes low end but falls off on the big end...For your application you will have low end grunt from the stroker, but the big end charge of a centrifugal. Most lil roots are good to 8 pounds some alil more but Prochargers, Vortechs you can get mad boost up to 35pounds of boost in some models....

Your camshaft choice has something to do with the boost you run too...

I'm seeing more than 8lbs on my 427 with a Radix so a guess the lil thing is do'in lil better than you thunk huh..
Old 09-15-2003, 10:04 PM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: memphis tn
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Is roots style that much better than centrifugal

Hey Ripped427 have you taken the SS to the track yet?
Old 09-15-2003, 10:32 PM
  #14  
TECH Resident
 
MNC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is roots style that much better than centrifugal

Hey Ripped427 have you taken the SS to the track yet?
Nope, still working on it... Got the fuel system straightened out. Two Fuel pumps from the tank up to the rails. Now I have to do somemore tuning. The Radix FPR increases the FP with boost. So with two pumps I'm seeing 70lbs so its a bit rich.
Old 09-15-2003, 11:23 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Flyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Armpit of East TX
Posts: 9,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is roots style that much better than centrifugal

I'm guessing FPR=fuel pressure regulator, if that's the case, then that is not correct. The pressure regulator is pulled from the factory intake and swapped over.

The fuel pressure regulator is same as stock .. maybe it's the second pump kicking in making the pressure raise up so high.
Old 09-17-2003, 12:13 AM
  #16  
TECH Resident
 
MNC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is roots style that much better than centrifugal

The fuel pressure regulator is same as stock .. maybe it's the second pump kicking in making the pressure raise up so high.
I could be wrong, but the regulator is connected to the intake after the SC via tubing. I also have the boost gauge tied into the same line.
Old 09-18-2003, 03:56 AM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Flyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Armpit of East TX
Posts: 9,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is roots style that much better than centrifugal

The regulator is inside that aluminum block (kinda L shaped) on the drivers side fuel rail where the fuel lines come in. It is the little button looking thing. It has a C-clip holding it in if that helps. It's kind of a dingy brown color.

It operates off of vacuum pressure. As the vacuum pressure rises, it closes the diaphram inside the regulator causing less fuel to go into the return line until it is eventually closed. Mine reached max fuel PSI at about 3 pounds of boost, or about 45-50% throttle.

If you showed me a picture of it, I could point it out for ya.

Maybe someone who knows more than I do can come in here and confirm that or tell me I'm wrong, and/or how bad wrong I am.
Old 09-18-2003, 10:32 PM
  #18  
TECH Resident
 
MNC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is roots style that much better than centrifugal

The regulator is inside that aluminum block (kinda L shaped) on the drivers side fuel rail where the fuel lines come in. It is the little button looking thing. It has a C-clip holding it in if that helps. It's kind of a dingy brown color.

It operates off of vacuum pressure. As the vacuum pressure rises, it closes the diaphram inside the regulator causing less fuel to go into the return line until it is eventually closed. Mine reached max fuel PSI at about 3 pounds of boost, or about 45-50% throttle.

If you showed me a picture of it, I could point it out for ya.

Maybe someone who knows more than I do can come in here and confirm that or tell me I'm wrong, and/or how bad wrong I am.
Capped off the regulator and plugged the line. Guess what a steady 58lbs throughout the RPM range Wright or Wrong I was on the right track
Old 09-19-2003, 02:04 AM
  #19  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Ryan23silverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,234
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Is roots style that much better than centrifugal

what if you could intercool a Whipple supercharger...? hmmmmm
Old 09-19-2003, 04:20 AM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Flyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Armpit of East TX
Posts: 9,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is roots style that much better than centrifugal

So .. did that fix your problem?


Quick Reply: Is roots style that much better than centrifugal



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24 AM.