GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

RADIX UPDATE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 10, 2003 | 05:53 PM
  #31  
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 1
From: memphis tn
Default Re: RADIX UPDATE

Flyer,you could have the chambers machined larger or run 6.0 heads,but a thicker head gasket would be cheaper.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2003 | 06:36 PM
  #32  
Flyer's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,342
Likes: 0
From: Armpit of East TX
Default Re: RADIX UPDATE

I would like to do a head cam swap on a 5.3 instead of building a 6.0. I would love to be able to lower the CR when I did this so I could crank up the boost.

Don't the 6.0 heads have a larger bore chamber that would make it funny fit on the 5.3?
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2003 | 09:35 PM
  #33  
MNC5's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 880
Likes: 1
From: Twin Cities
Default Re: RADIX UPDATE

The Lightnings 5.4L (8.4:1) engine has over 1 point less compression than a LM7 5.3L (9.5:1). This allows the Lightning to handle more boost easier. Not only that, the 5.4L engine in the Lightning has a rotating assembly designed for higher cylinder pressures as well.
There aren't many differences between a standard 5.4 and the lightning motor. And it(5.4 Ford) still isn't as good as the LS1 as far as strength or performance. Plus I don't think anyone is going to break a crank or blow a head gasket with some additional boost on top of a 1 point increase in the CR . The car guys with ATI's ect have done some larger boost on stock motors.. The same limits of boost would apply? Wouldn't they....Just make sure you have the fuel to go with the boost.

As far as the lower CR, I'm not sold on cranking compression being lower making it easier to handle boost either. The effective compression ratio is more important.. The lower static CR should allow you to run more boost w/o Detonation but its not worth it unless your getting very serious about the boost.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2003 | 10:51 PM
  #34  
ArizonaSpeed's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, AZ
Default Re: RADIX UPDATE

There aren't many differences between a standard 5.4 and the lightning motor. And it(5.4 Ford) still isn't as good as the LS1 as far as strength or performance. Plus I don't think anyone is going to break a crank or blow a head gasket with some additional boost on top of a 1 point increase in the CR . The car guys with ATI's ect have done some larger boost on stock motors.. The same limits of boost would apply? Wouldn't they....Just make sure you have the fuel to go with the boost.

As far as the lower CR, I'm not sold on cranking compression being lower making it easier to handle boost either. The effective compression ratio is more important.. The lower static CR should allow you to run more boost w/o Detonation but its not worth it unless your getting very serious about the boost.
I think the weakpoint ends up being the stock pistons. They don't tolerate detonation very well. Its a very hard and brittle piston that will crack like a spider web and the piston literally will fall apart. The lower static CR does allow you to run more boost w/o detonation and that was exactly my point. We are talking about street driven trucks running pump gas.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2003 | 11:13 PM
  #35  
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 1
From: memphis tn
Default Re: RADIX UPDATE

In Arizona is the premium 91 octane or 93 octane?I run a 3" pulley on my 5.3 Radix with no problems.I do put 104 octane in to run at the track and mix xylene for about 98octane on the street.I do run a 160 degree thermostat.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2003 | 11:16 PM
  #36  
ArizonaSpeed's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, AZ
Default Re: RADIX UPDATE

We only have 91 here in AZ. Have you ever run it with just premium pump gas??? How much boost are you seeing with the 3.0 pulley??
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2003 | 11:32 PM
  #37  
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 1
From: memphis tn
Default Re: RADIX UPDATE

Yes I have run on just premium to drive to and from work I don't think there would be a problem with the 93 unless I made repeated runs or ran with the engine hot and heat soak became a factor.If I'm running on 93 octane I usually keep my foot out of it.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2003 | 11:33 PM
  #38  
MNC5's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 880
Likes: 1
From: Twin Cities
Default Re: RADIX UPDATE


I think the weakpoint ends up being the stock pistons. They don't tolerate detonation very well. Its a very hard and brittle piston that will crack like a spider web and the piston literally will fall apart. The lower static CR does allow you to run more boost w/o detonation and that was exactly my point. We are talking about street driven trucks running pump gas.
My point was you can tune around detonation and still go with some more boost Run it rich @ WOT if you have chitty fuel. I agree about the pistons, but there's room for boost. Just wish we had a bullet proof tranny like the Ford Automatic
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2003 | 11:34 PM
  #39  
ArizonaSpeed's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, AZ
Default Re: RADIX UPDATE

How much boost does it make with the 3 inch pulley?
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2003 | 11:38 PM
  #40  
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 1
From: memphis tn
Default Re: RADIX UPDATE

9 1/2 LBS of boost with 3" pulley climbs to 10 1/2 at my 5800rpm shift points.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 PM.