Radix GT2-3, LS2 90MM TB Results 94 RWHP
05-05-2006, 10:40 PM
#15
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Md
Posts: 3,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 03sierraslt
How well does that cam respond on a 6.0? I have seen many people are using that cam however I dont recall any results on a 6.0, would I benifit from a slightly larger cam then that or no?
05-06-2006, 05:11 AM
#17
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 3,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think a lot will come down to how well you want your idle quality, MPG's, & driveability. A bigger cam may allow more power, but it may come with a few cons.
It depends if you will want everyday use or just strip use.
What I wanted to know was, what was his dyno results prior to the cam, pulley, and 90mm TB? Or prior of just the 90mm TB and smaller pulley?
Either I missed it, or I don't know his background like some of you do.
Jim
It depends if you will want everyday use or just strip use.
What I wanted to know was, what was his dyno results prior to the cam, pulley, and 90mm TB? Or prior of just the 90mm TB and smaller pulley?
Either I missed it, or I don't know his background like some of you do.
Jim
05-06-2006, 10:22 AM
#20
Originally Posted by CHEVY6000VHO
What I wanted to know was, what was his dyno results prior to the cam, pulley, and 90mm TB? Or prior of just the 90mm TB and smaller pulley?
Either I missed it, or I don't know his background like some of you do.
Jim
Either I missed it, or I don't know his background like some of you do.
Jim
334rwhp was baseline (blower only, and stock Radix tune)
391rwhp was Cam, TB, and 3.2 pulley on 18* of timing
428rwhp was Cam, TB, and 3.2 pulley on 21* of timing