my memory is failing me
#2
They are a different length. The 4.8 rods are longer to accomodate the shorter stroke of the 4.8. If you're going through the trouble of tearing the engine down for new rods, I'd look into aftermarket pieces if I were you.
#3
Originally Posted by Scream
They are a different length. The 4.8 rods are longer to accomodate the shorter stroke of the 4.8. If you're going through the trouble of tearing the engine down for new rods, I'd look into aftermarket pieces if I were you.
well the only reason i'm considering this is b/c i can get them cheap and i'm putting a turbo on. shorter rods = lower compression but i also have 6.0L heads sitting in my garage doing nothing.
should i just do the heads? just do the rods? do both? i dunno
the most boost i will prob run is 8 to 10psi
#5
Originally Posted by zippy
forgive my ignorance... but why is that a problem? and i dont have to. I was just wondering if it was worth it or possible
#7
Nope you are right Zippy. Blacksilver you would be much better off using the 6.0L heads, as long as they are the casting #317, than the internals swap. It will drop your compression to around 8.5:1 or so if your are thinking high boost levels. Plenty of folks here have abused the 4.8L engines with no failures near 600HP.
There is no difference in the strength of the internal parts and the 4.8L is the only GenIII motor with the altered crank/rod length. The 5.3, 5.7, and 6.0L are identical short of bore size.
If your motor is out you might want to add some ARP rod and main bolts else have fun!
There is no difference in the strength of the internal parts and the 4.8L is the only GenIII motor with the altered crank/rod length. The 5.3, 5.7, and 6.0L are identical short of bore size.
If your motor is out you might want to add some ARP rod and main bolts else have fun!
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by ktmrider
Nope you are right Zippy. Blacksilver you would be much better off using the 6.0L heads, as long as they are the casting #317, than the internals swap. It will drop your compression to around 8.5:1 or so if your are thinking high boost levels. Plenty of folks here have abused the 4.8L engines with no failures near 600HP.
There is no difference in the strength of the internal parts and the 4.8L is the only GenIII motor with the altered crank/rod length. The 5.3, 5.7, and 6.0L are identical short of bore size.
If your motor is out you might want to add some ARP rod and main bolts else have fun!
There is no difference in the strength of the internal parts and the 4.8L is the only GenIII motor with the altered crank/rod length. The 5.3, 5.7, and 6.0L are identical short of bore size.
If your motor is out you might want to add some ARP rod and main bolts else have fun!
thanks guys for the good advice
6L heads are go
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Porscharu914
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
14
Jan 20, 2016 10:45 AM
Tydriver
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
45
Oct 23, 2015 09:19 PM
atxlt
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
1
Jul 20, 2015 11:06 PM




