GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

JBA shorty headers installed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 18, 2012 | 05:01 PM
  #1  
99 2500's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default JBA shorty headers installed

Just finished installing JBA headers on my 2002 Tahoe with 5.3L engine. Did a before 0-60 on a G-tech which was 8.1 sec and after headers is 7.8 sec, so much for shorty headers not being any better than stock manifolds. Here is a picture before installation
Attached Thumbnails JBA shorty headers installed-photo.jpg  
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2012 | 09:11 PM
  #2  
TheBigWangTheory's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

.3 seconds is a reaction time difference. if you did ten before runs and ten after runs and saw the same .3 better time, then id brag about it.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2012 | 10:08 PM
  #3  
99 2500's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default

Originally Posted by TheBigWangTheory
.3 seconds is a reaction time difference. if you did ten before runs and ten after runs and saw the same .3 better time, then id brag about it.
I should have said this differently, I can't count the amount times it has done 0-60 in 8.1 sec, so this was the usual. After the headers first run was 7.7 then two more after that were 7.8, so no need to brag it is what it is.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2012 | 02:43 PM
  #4  
topfueljim's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default JBA Shorties

I put JBA shorty headers on mine, too. (CA smog laws and all) I know they are not nearly as good as tuned long tubes would be, but my SOP dyno felt a definite measurable upper rpm improvement over stock cast iron. Along those same lines, I also later put on some SLP 1.85 rockers. I also know that this is no substitute for a real cam change, but again I felt a very real increase in torque across the rpm range (and it was easy to do). I'm still slow, but less slow than before!
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2012 | 03:15 PM
  #5  
Ferocity02's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,447
Likes: 2
Default

There is no doubt that shorties are better than stock. Most people just get caught up comparing shorties to LT's.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2012 | 12:47 PM
  #6  
NemesisC5's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
From: Port Arthur, TX 77642
Default

Anyone here do shorties with high flow metal matrix cats? That would be a more realistic comparison considering most LT headers come with high flow cats. It's still comparing apples and oranges but I am more than curious of what the power difference would be.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2012 | 01:26 PM
  #7  
Foxxer's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: Dubai, U.A.E.
Default

Oh my.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2012 | 11:02 PM
  #8  
gtyler04's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Default

Well either way man, if you got any improvement (real or mental) its a plus! Enjoy the headers!
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2012 | 10:14 AM
  #9  
NemesisC5's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
From: Port Arthur, TX 77642
Default

Originally Posted by 99 2500
Just finished installing JBA headers on my 2002 Tahoe with 5.3L engine. Did a before 0-60 on a G-tech which was 8.1 sec and after headers is 7.8 sec, so much for shorty headers not being any better than stock manifolds. Here is a picture before installation
How much did these cost? I am assuming you ran these through factory cats? Did you tune afterwards?

Originally Posted by topfueljim
I put JBA shorty headers on mine, too. (CA smog laws and all) I know they are not nearly as good as tuned long tubes would be, but my SOP dyno felt a definite measurable upper rpm improvement over stock cast iron. Along those same lines, I also later put on some SLP 1.85 rockers. I also know that this is no substitute for a real cam change, but again I felt a very real increase in torque across the rpm range (and it was easy to do). I'm still slow, but less slow than before!
Did you run through factory cats? Did the shorties change the sound? Did you tune after shorties? Did you tune after 1.85 rockers?

I was told by several header manufacturers that the factory cats are very restrictive. I removed them from my 99 Vette early in the mod process and had only canned Hypertech tune, replaced later with Kooks LT's (no slight on Kooks product, they are quality product) and a dyno tune for only a 9 rwhp increase....in this case it was not a good return on investment in my opinion. I'm sure that I realized the benefits later when I installed supercharger.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2012 | 11:42 AM
  #10  
99 2500's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default

[QUOTE=NemesisC5;5029428]How much did these cost? I am assuming you ran these through factory cats? Did you tune afterwards?



Yes running through factory cats without a tune, the funny thing is I actually put these on to see if it would help Mpg and so far it looks like I got an extra mile to the gallon. I got them for $468 shipped from autoanything.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 AM.