GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Good alternative to AMW catch can?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 03:09 PM
  #11  
jerome's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
From: Tacoma, WA
Default

http://www.thunderracing.com/catalog...ories&pcid=287
would that work to do the same thing?
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 03:52 PM
  #12  
04BlackSilverado's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
From: New England
Default

Originally Posted by OLD BULL
They don't have any baffling or any thing inside to separate the oil mist from the air. The AMW and the Lingerfelter have a mesh filter element.
Yeah thats what I thought.


Originally Posted by greentahoe
I just made this today. Im going to hook it up tomorrow. https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=398599
So this guy dosent have anything stopping oil from going into the intake? right?

I thought the purpose of the CATCHcan was to catch the oil in the system before it got to the intake
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 05:12 PM
  #13  
99Silver6.0's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,039
Likes: 1
From: Olathe, Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by jerome
http://www.thunderracing.com/catalog...ories&pcid=287
would that work to do the same thing?
YES. Someone FINALLY sees the light on that one. But its not a catch can. The LS6 cover is about the best way to help with the oil consumption. In some cases both the cover and a catch can are used to combat the problem. But after the LS6 cover is on, it usually does the trick. But sometimes, the vent tube becomes a problem. That is the shorter hose on the passenger side of the motor at the valve cover and hooks to the TB. It really is best to plug that bastard and get the Metco breather cap.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 05:39 PM
  #14  
greentahoe's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,784
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Fl
Default

Originally Posted by 04BlackSilverado
Yeah thats what I thought.




So this guy dosent have anything stopping oil from going into the intake? right?

I thought the purpose of the CATCHcan was to catch the oil in the system before it got to the intake
The intake is plugged off. I was told by several shops on LS1Tech that on the big boost setups, they simply plug the manifold and run the 2 lines from the valve covers to the catch can breather.
From what I understand, the reason for the plug on the manifold is simply to provide vacuum to "pull" air from the valve covers. The problem is that you need a PCV or check valve on that line to prevent boost from coming off the manifold and actually pressurizing the crank case. The real thing Im trying to accomplish is keeping pressure from building in the crank case. Since I have to plug the manifold, I have no issues with oil getting into the intake. Some suggest needing a vacuum source to pull the air/oil through the valve covers and PCV system, but I havent come to any real reason why this is needed. I can see pressurized air coming out of the valve covers and possibly getting some oil into the vacuum source which is usually just preblower or turbo which gives you the chance of having oil/ muck into the impellars and even intercooler.
And Im done. This is all Ive gathered from 3 days of study.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 05:59 PM
  #15  
14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,619
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, Il
Default

The problem with not having a vacuum source on the crankcase is that it is needed to pull out the blow by that occurs in all engines in small amounts. Without a vacuum source the crankcase will pressurize from that alone, although it will be minimal. Having vacuum to the manifold actually helps with power productions especially on boosted applications. The trick is to get the crankcase evacuated under boost which is why race cars run crancase evac systems that scavange through the exhaust. Even while not under boost you still need to pull the leakdown out of the crankcase- it helps with ring sealing, oil consumption, and economy.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 06:23 PM
  #16  
greentahoe's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,784
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Fl
Default

Originally Posted by mzoomora
The problem with not having a vacuum source on the crankcase is that it is needed to pull out the blow by that occurs in all engines in small amounts. Without a vacuum source the crankcase will pressurize from that alone, although it will be minimal. Having vacuum to the manifold actually helps with power productions especially on boosted applications. The trick is to get the crankcase evacuated under boost which is why race cars run crancase evac systems that scavange through the exhaust. Even while not under boost you still need to pull the leakdown out of the crankcase- it helps with ring sealing, oil consumption, and economy.
The way it was explained to me by some guys that are making the big turbo LS1 kits is that blowby is a product of the pistons and ringlands. It is pressure. Why would you need vacuum to evacuate pressurized air/oil?? I agree that getting a little vacuum could only help, but with my setup it would be pretty difficult and of very little added benefit. The way I look at it is how much pressure could really be going to the crankcase with my setup?? I have a 1 1/2 opening on my breather. That would be more than enough to let out all 11lbs or so of boost that Im seeing if it were on the intake pipe. I know b/c the outlet on my blowoff valve is near the same size and it is rated up to 14lbs on a T trim which has a much greater CFM rating than my S trim that is on the truck now. That will change soon though
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2007 | 07:09 PM
  #17  
negativeswitches's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
From: belleville, il
Default

somewhat offtopic but a fellow auto student brought to my attention that gm has a TSB on the pcv valve to replace it with an open orafice tube

-erik
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2007 | 08:37 PM
  #18  
budhayes3's Avatar
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by negativeswitches
somewhat offtopic but a fellow auto student brought to my attention that gm has a TSB on the pcv valve to replace it with an open orafice tube

-erik
I tried that, it didn't work My PCV hose was still filled with oil. Then I installed a homemade catch can that quickly filled up about a half inch until oil started bypassing it into the intake. After that I bought an AMW catch can (luckily before they doubled in price), and so far, so good. I actually went back to the original spring and plunger style PCV valve as the fixed orifice one whistled when combined with the catch can...it was pretty annoying.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2007 | 10:30 PM
  #19  
04BlackGmc's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 0
From: STL
Default

i have a ebay one works ok...it catches oil...

now my question is why cant we plug off the intake and then run a breather on the Crankcase vent?
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2007 | 04:18 AM
  #20  
03sierraslt's Avatar
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,007
Likes: 221
From: Western PA
Default

Ok, well we still dont know how much they are so... Guess they are not for sale...
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 PM.