Good alternative to AMW catch can?
#11
#12
Originally Posted by OLD BULL
They don't have any baffling or any thing inside to separate the oil mist from the air. The AMW and the Lingerfelter have a mesh filter element.
Originally Posted by greentahoe
I just made this today. Im going to hook it up tomorrow. https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=398599
I thought the purpose of the CATCHcan was to catch the oil in the system before it got to the intake
#13
Originally Posted by jerome
http://www.thunderracing.com/catalog...ories&pcid=287
would that work to do the same thing?
would that work to do the same thing?
#14
Originally Posted by 04BlackSilverado
Yeah thats what I thought.
So this guy dosent have anything stopping oil from going into the intake? right?
I thought the purpose of the CATCHcan was to catch the oil in the system before it got to the intake
So this guy dosent have anything stopping oil from going into the intake? right?
I thought the purpose of the CATCHcan was to catch the oil in the system before it got to the intake
From what I understand, the reason for the plug on the manifold is simply to provide vacuum to "pull" air from the valve covers. The problem is that you need a PCV or check valve on that line to prevent boost from coming off the manifold and actually pressurizing the crank case. The real thing Im trying to accomplish is keeping pressure from building in the crank case. Since I have to plug the manifold, I have no issues with oil getting into the intake. Some suggest needing a vacuum source to pull the air/oil through the valve covers and PCV system, but I havent come to any real reason why this is needed. I can see pressurized air coming out of the valve covers and possibly getting some oil into the vacuum source which is usually just preblower or turbo which gives you the chance of having oil/ muck into the impellars and even intercooler.
And Im done. This is all Ive gathered from 3 days of study.
#15
14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,619
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, Il
The problem with not having a vacuum source on the crankcase is that it is needed to pull out the blow by that occurs in all engines in small amounts. Without a vacuum source the crankcase will pressurize from that alone, although it will be minimal. Having vacuum to the manifold actually helps with power productions especially on boosted applications. The trick is to get the crankcase evacuated under boost which is why race cars run crancase evac systems that scavange through the exhaust. Even while not under boost you still need to pull the leakdown out of the crankcase- it helps with ring sealing, oil consumption, and economy.
#16
Originally Posted by mzoomora
The problem with not having a vacuum source on the crankcase is that it is needed to pull out the blow by that occurs in all engines in small amounts. Without a vacuum source the crankcase will pressurize from that alone, although it will be minimal. Having vacuum to the manifold actually helps with power productions especially on boosted applications. The trick is to get the crankcase evacuated under boost which is why race cars run crancase evac systems that scavange through the exhaust. Even while not under boost you still need to pull the leakdown out of the crankcase- it helps with ring sealing, oil consumption, and economy.
#18
Originally Posted by negativeswitches
somewhat offtopic but a fellow auto student brought to my attention that gm has a TSB on the pcv valve to replace it with an open orafice tube
-erik
-erik
My PCV hose was still filled with oil. Then I installed a homemade catch can that quickly filled up about a half inch until oil started bypassing it into the intake. After that I bought an AMW catch can (luckily before they doubled in price), and so far, so good. I actually went back to the original spring and plunger style PCV valve as the fixed orifice one whistled when combined with the catch can...it was pretty annoying.


