Edelbrock Victor Jr installed on H2
08-20-2006, 12:25 PM
#11
Originally Posted by CHarris
The turbo is still the plan... but either way this intake is a good move. I gained nearly 30% cross section area under the fuel injector in the manifold. This intake definitely pulls more top end.
08-20-2006, 12:38 PM
#12
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northeast, NJ
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm, makes me rethink that FAST 90/LS2 TB plan I was set on. What is the rpm range that Edelbrock advertises with the Victor Jr.?
Since you have a returnless fuel system, why did you put the y on the factory fuel line and then into each rail when there was already a crossover line?
Also, did you do any porting of the manifold or just bolt it on?
Since you have a returnless fuel system, why did you put the y on the factory fuel line and then into each rail when there was already a crossover line?
Also, did you do any porting of the manifold or just bolt it on?
Last edited by tdrumm; 08-20-2006 at 01:16 PM.
08-20-2006, 05:01 PM
#14
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by moregrip
good deal, any ETA on the new setup?
08-20-2006, 05:11 PM
#15
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by tdrumm
Hmm, makes me rethink that FAST 90/LS2 TB plan I was set on. What is the rpm range that Edelbrock advertises with the Victor Jr.?
Since you have a returnless fuel system, why did you put the y on the factory fuel line and then into each rail when there was already a crossover line?
Also, did you do any porting of the manifold or just bolt it on?
Since you have a returnless fuel system, why did you put the y on the factory fuel line and then into each rail when there was already a crossover line?
Also, did you do any porting of the manifold or just bolt it on?
The fuel system goes from the factory connector to a NOS (brand name!!!) 6AN y-fitting. Then it goe to each individual rail at the front via 6AN hoses. Both rails are joined at the rear with another 6AN crossover hose. The hoses are Aeroquip TFE (Teflon inside with braided stainless outside). I thought about just going into the end of only one fuel rail... but I didn't like the thought of any one injector being "last" in line. It just seemed like fueling a "loop" was a better idea. I couldn't think of any reason not to do it like I did.
Here's a link to the porting I did here.
08-21-2006, 08:29 AM
#17
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cleveland Mississippi
Posts: 6,204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good deal! Glad to see someone went this route on their truck. Quick question. Everything I've read on this intake says its good up to 600hp. Will it be good for over that number?
08-21-2006, 08:41 AM
#18
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by slowprocess
Good deal! Glad to see someone went this route on their truck. Quick question. Everything I've read on this intake says its good up to 600hp. Will it be good for over that number?
08-21-2006, 10:19 AM
#19
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cleveland Mississippi
Posts: 6,204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CHarris
My rough calculations on cross section suggest that my ported Edelbrock is nearly 25% larger at the choke point (under the injector) than the LS6 manifold. It's no sheetmetal intake... but its no slouch either
