GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Blower Cams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 2, 2005 | 04:09 PM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: North of HotLanta,GA
Default

i'm with flyer on this one, the smaller one would be something i would put in a 5.3. but you have a 6.0.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2005 | 07:09 PM
  #12  
moregrip's Avatar
Thread Starter
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3
Remember this. The lobe seperation angle is "A" key in idle quality. Take this camshaft.
210/210 @ .05, Comp Lobe. With a lobe seperation angle of 115*, it has -20* of valve overlap @ .05 valve lift. Tightening the lobe distance to 110* creates more overlap... -10*. Take a look at that chart. It helps. Move the seperation closer, and you see how the lobes overlap. Move the seperation apart and you have less overlap.
So for example, a 220/220 on a 115lsa, may have the exact same idle characteristics of a 210/210 on a 110lsa.

Simply put: Overlap = duration vs. lobe distance (lsa)
I understand this. thanks. Are my above observations correct and incomplete? OR are you saying they are wrong?

whats the calculation for overlap?
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2005 | 07:10 PM
  #13  
moregrip's Avatar
Thread Starter
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by Flyer
Personally ... I still don't like the huge split going on there knowing your gonna be putting headers on there. I would go with the 218/224 without a question or second thought. The only 2nd thought I might have would be going to something a little bigger.

There will be plenty of power under the curve with the blower on top.
the first Cam is "Cam Motions" Recommendation,

the second is Vinci's 045,
"THE TRUCKER"
STREET / STRIP / POWER
RPM RANGE 2200 TO 6000
TUNING REQUIRED
POWERFUL CHOPPY IDLE
DYNAMITE WITH A WHEEZEr.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2005 | 07:14 PM
  #14  
moregrip's Avatar
Thread Starter
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

This is my 3rd serious contender:

Thunder Racing Custom "Old Man Truck" Camshaft - 214/220 .600/.525 115+2 LSA This is the perfect cam for someone looking for a stock range power band and stock sounding idle. Significant horsepower gains throughout the RPM range. No computer tuning required.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2005 | 07:16 PM
  #15  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

Nope you had it, I just wanted to clear it up that overlap is the main cause of the bad idle quality, and not lsa.

Some think that a camshaft must have a 115* lsa to idle well. This is not the case. Sorry if I was soap boxing.

You can use (Intake Duration + Exhaust Duration) / 2 - (LSA * 2).
Ex.
210/210 on a 110lsa
210 + 210 / 2 = (210-) 110 * 2 = (220) = -10* of overlap @ .05
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2005 | 07:20 PM
  #16  
moregrip's Avatar
Thread Starter
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3
Nope you had it, I just wanted to clear it up that overlap is the main cause of the bad idle quality, and not lsa.

Some think that a camshaft must have a 115* lsa to idle well. This is not the case. Sorry if I was soap boxing.
Cool, I was just saying I thought overlap was the big factor in idle quality and not LSA to NakedAV. From what your saying, you agree, cool. A dude named HitManX and myself went back and forth on this for about 2 hours last night hashing this out. We must have gone over 10 Cams specs to get some sort of idea.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2005 | 07:25 PM
  #17  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

A wide lobe seperation is a sacrifice of power for a decent idle quality. Even with a blower camshaft. I really don't think the radix is creating enough boost where overlap is a big concern. Especially with the emissions in Cali. Overlap equals power.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2005 | 08:17 PM
  #18  
moregrip's Avatar
Thread Starter
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3
A wide lobe seperation is a sacrifice of power for a decent idle quality. Even with a blower camshaft. I really don't think the radix is creating enough boost where overlap is a big concern. Especially with the emissions in Cali. Overlap equals power.
I thought blower cams liked negative overlap? your saying that a cam with more overlap will make more power? Is there a point where this is less true? i.e. after -10deg overlap a blower cam will make less power but up until that point it would make more?

how much overlap to you recommend?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 12:41 AM
  #19  
moregrip's Avatar
Thread Starter
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

any further thoughts, or help?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2005 | 12:42 AM
  #20  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by moregrip
any further thoughts, or help?
yeah go to sleep!
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 PM.