GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

B1 Cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2004 | 08:58 AM
  #11  
marc_w's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
From: Central, MA
Default

Okay... yeah, I just checked out their site.

Lunati makes a cam with those same specs... in either a 112 or 114. That must be what I was thinking of.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 09:25 AM
  #12  
marc_w's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
From: Central, MA
Default

Nope.... Lunati used to grind for MTI. That's what I was thinking.

They shared specs on the B1.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 11:47 AM
  #13  
WhiteDiamond's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

I ran the B1 cam on my 1998 TransAm WS6. I would personally go with the TR224 on 114 at this point(basically, identicle chracteristics but a faster ramp with a hair less overlap). Anyway, the B1 with the ported heads made power from just off idle to 6400rpm. Nowhere in the torque curve was it ever lower than my full bolt-on dyno pull. My final results where 432rwhp and 398rwtq through catalytic converters with a cutout just after the y-pipe merge(custom built 3" Y-pipe with high flow cats). I don't see any reason why it wouldn't be a good cam, as the torque is there and stronger than stock for the LS1, but it revs a little high for the trucks, IMO. Just check out the TR224 if you really plan on going for a cam this size.

Todd
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2500ZL1
8-Lug Truck Performance
60
Jan 25, 2016 06:30 AM
lawhitediamante
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
5
Aug 12, 2015 12:14 PM
steves86ta
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
Jul 28, 2015 10:21 AM
WICK3DxGATA
FORCED INDUCTION
4
Jul 21, 2015 06:59 PM
projectnightcrawler
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
Jul 19, 2015 11:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 PM.