Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

another "is this the right cam"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2008, 12:07 AM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Thechevyman122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tyler, Tx
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default another "is this the right cam"

03 denali lq4 6.0. Does tow some (but rarely and nothing too heavy) I will get a converter somewhere in the 2600 to 3000 range. (probly a trailblazer converter because of the price) I want a cam with performance benefits that is about as much as tolerable as a daily driver, that wont effect my highway mileage and that gives me as much lope as possible. This is the cam im looking at...TSP 220 220 112 lsa cam what do yall think?

Last edited by Thechevyman122; 06-23-2008 at 08:05 AM.
Old 06-23-2008, 02:37 AM
  #2  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
AdioSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Texas 75707
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Thechevyman122
wont effect my highway mileage and that gives me as much lope as possible.
pick one or the other...

From what you said, I would go with a split duration cam that has more exhaust duration than the intake.

Lope is a byproduct of overlap. More overlap = more lope.

However at the same time, Less overlap = better mileage.
Old 06-23-2008, 08:03 AM
  #3  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Thechevyman122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tyler, Tx
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

k, well im not worried about mileage to an EXTENT...i mean i get like 12.5/17.5 so its not really that great, granted i dont want to lose any of it, but im not expecting to gain anything from a cam swap. With that being said this cam is for sale online in the classifieds and i would like to save the money and buy a used one. Does this cam seem right? would it lope? match well with a 2600 trailblazer converter up to a 3000 yank or something?
Old 06-23-2008, 08:25 AM
  #4  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
02Denali6L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sound clip of mine before headers...
[/
Old 06-23-2008, 12:36 PM
  #5  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Thechevyman122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tyler, Tx
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

did you notice big gains? loss in mileage? did you install the cam and the converter at the same time? would you do anything different? would your 220/224 have more of a lope than this 220/220?
Old 06-24-2008, 07:47 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
02Denali6L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Thechevyman122
did you notice big gains? loss in mileage? did you install the cam and the converter at the same time? would you do anything different? would your 220/224 have more of a lope than this 220/220?
I did mods in the following order:
Gains 2/10=barely noticeable, 5/10=clear SOTP gain
1 - tune, 160, and CAI (3/10)
2 - trans and TC (4/10) 9.7@70mph
3 - true duals (2/10)
4 - cam, UD pulley (5/10) 9.3@75mph
5 - LT headers (2/10)

I would not do a cam before the converter. This is not too much cam for a 6L. If you weigh over 5000lbs then I would not recommend over 224* on the intake. The 220/220 or a 224/220 would be something I might consider since I have free flowing exhaust and the factory intake.

An aggressive 93 tune has left my gas mileage the same at cruise. The TC will be the death of gas mileage. Force your TC to lock early to offset some of this.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:12 PM.