All motor or boost discussion
#1
Originally I was going to build an all motor 400hp (to the wheels) 5.3 but I started looking at vortec supercharger kits and now im wondering if I should go that route instead...any input?
#2
I debate this for years. Vortec blowers are not that common around here. Alot of Maggies, or some prochargers are the weapons of choice. MY dad had a bortec, and it was jsut that, boring. WAsnt impressive at all. Your better off in the Maggie route for FI
I decided to jsut got a 6.0L swap, motors are plentiful, and you spend 2-3 grand on the motor and it will have atleast 400rwhp, and be fairly reliable at that. Be alot cheaper then doing FI.
REally depends on what you want. I roll with a muscle car and rat rod crew, and a huge choppy cam is what I like
I decided to jsut got a 6.0L swap, motors are plentiful, and you spend 2-3 grand on the motor and it will have atleast 400rwhp, and be fairly reliable at that. Be alot cheaper then doing FI.
REally depends on what you want. I roll with a muscle car and rat rod crew, and a huge choppy cam is what I like
#3
There are not many 5.3s anywhere close to 400rwhp so my vote is boost. Just personal preference but I would do a turbo. I chose a turbo because of prior experience with belt slip on a powerdyne blower and cause I like the sound.
#6
I do see more 6.0 builds but my main reasons for wanting a 5.3 is the weight and the rpm capability, I love chopy cams and high rpm v8's. I been searching for info trying to compare it to the 5.3 but I havn't been so lucky
I'm addicted to boost too lol last motor was a turbo 4 banger and I loved it.
I'm addicted to boost too lol last motor was a turbo 4 banger and I loved it.
#7
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Ohhh boy... 
There's no weight difference between the two, none at all. Nor is there any noticeable difference in RPM capability between a 5.3L and a 6.0L. Not sure where you got that info from but you've been led wrong.
Secondly, getting 400 rwhp out of a 5.3L N/A is gonna cost you alot of money and if you did get past 400rwhp you wouldn't have a very streetable set-up. Firgure out how much power you want first, then chose the motor that will get you there.

There's no weight difference between the two, none at all. Nor is there any noticeable difference in RPM capability between a 5.3L and a 6.0L. Not sure where you got that info from but you've been led wrong.
Secondly, getting 400 rwhp out of a 5.3L N/A is gonna cost you alot of money and if you did get past 400rwhp you wouldn't have a very streetable set-up. Firgure out how much power you want first, then chose the motor that will get you there.
Trending Topics
#8
Excuse my french but NO ****?? lol that made my day I got the info from some dumb *** which was why I was trying to find out if he was wrong or not, but man Ive been sitting here running combo after combo trying to figure out how I was going to get 400 and still be able to drive everywhere. Thanks for clearing that up for me.


