GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

6.0 #'s?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 04:25 PM
  #11  
parish8's Avatar
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 2
From: omaha ne
Default

234/232 595/590 115+1
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 08:56 PM
  #12  
tooquick2beslo's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From: Newport News, Va
Default

Do you think that cam is streetable for a daily driver ?
Also you think that cam will out perform the new thunder racing cam they have out that produces 450 rwhp cam only results ?
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 09:22 PM
  #13  
parish8's Avatar
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 2
From: omaha ne
Default

Originally Posted by tooquick2beslo
Do you think that cam is streetable for a daily driver ?
Also you think that cam will out perform the new thunder racing cam they have out that produces 450 rwhp cam only results ?
it is "streetable" but needs a stall and tuning. you can see from the chart that i lost quite a bit of low end. i wouldnt get this cam unless you are planing on a 4000 or higher stall.

this cam was sized for a 408 turbo motor. when i put it in the 6.0 and was NA it lost a lot of low end, it wasn't nearly as much fun to drive but at 4300 or so you could feel the cam come on hard and it would pull all the way to 7000rpm easy. now with the turbo i got my low end back, in fact i am 150ft/lb's up at 3500rpm . in a 408 it should have some insane TQ.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 10:33 PM
  #14  
Round Rock TA's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: Round Rock Texas
Default

Originally Posted by parish8
the size of the truck will have no effect on dyno HP and i have all the HD 4wd parts that his truck does. my rear diferential isn't as heafty though.

222 seems prety low for a 6.0. dont really know what to say about that.

I did not know you were 4x4.

And are you saying that more chassis flex absorbing HP from a longer truck and having to turn a super long driveshaft will yield a 0hp loss over a shorter truck? I thought there would be some loss in HP but I could be wrong of course.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 10:40 PM
  #15  
parish8's Avatar
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 2
From: omaha ne
Default

the extra drive shaft might eat 1hp.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2011 | 06:18 PM
  #16  
Huntingman2706217's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 143
Likes: 1
From: Griffin G.A.
Default

i know this is old but at least i searched right?
any other numbers out there since then for the stock (or close to stock) 6.0 at RWH then these two listed? wondering what i gained after these mods and my dyno? googled and found nothing... came here and searched this one up but its the only i can find... flywheels numbers are all over the net but not RWH... thanks!
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2011 | 09:08 PM
  #17  
00silvylq4's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Lawton, OK
Default

my stock 6.0 made 249 whp and 274 trq through a 2wd 4l80e
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GMCtrk
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
18
Oct 6, 2015 03:48 PM
turbo6c3
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
1
Oct 5, 2015 06:11 PM
Cammed4ever
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
Sep 30, 2015 03:38 PM
trevorh1
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
4
Sep 27, 2015 08:47 PM
sTNT971
FORCED INDUCTION
6
Sep 26, 2015 04:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 PM.