Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.3 Flat Top Pistons-

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-2004, 11:49 AM
  #11  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
OldNovaGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BigTex
You can take a 6L block and add a 4.8 crank to it. Thats a 4" bore with a 3.267" stroke (101.6mm x 83mm). That would give you 328 cubic inches. You'd benefit from the higher revving short stroke and power from the larger bore. Add a set of diamond pistons and LS6 heads.


Hmmm...this reminds me of the old days when we took 327 blocks and put 283 cranks in them with the L79 cam and built 302s.

So, anybody got any of these pieces cause all I got is the heads and a 5.3.
Old 08-03-2004, 12:11 PM
  #12  
? ? ? ? ? ?
iTrader: (16)
 
BigTex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: East of Dallas
Posts: 7,126
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I'm sure you can find a 4.8 crank pretty easily for pretty cheap. Used 6L bare blocks can be had for a couple hundred. That would make a nice "327", but I'd sure hate to give up that extra 40 cubic inches.

I got it! Take a standard 6L block, bore out to 4.020 then add an Eagle 3.9" stroker crank. You'd get exactly 396 cubic inches and would make a ton more torque and power. Think 450 rwhp and tq compared to 350 of the 327. That sounds perfect for a classic nova.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...spagename=WDVW
Old 08-03-2004, 12:36 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
 
ktmrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Boy, the possibilities are endless! OldNovaGuy, you can now have your HO 396 "big" block cubes instead of the 327 small block.
OK, now are you more or less confused?!? The advice is solid and plentiful.
Old 08-09-2004, 05:52 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Andy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BigTex
You can take a 6L block and add a 4.8 crank to it. Thats a 4" bore with a 3.267" stroke (101.6mm x 83mm). That would give you 328 cubic inches. You'd benefit from the higher revving short stroke and power from the larger bore. Add a set of diamond pistons and LS6 heads.
Big Tex,

Do you happen to know if the parts will actually interchange? Will the crank fit? Use the 4.8 rods (nice and long)? Do you happen to know what the combustion chamber volumes are of the stock 4.8 & 5.3 heads? Can you direct me to some of this kind of fundamental info regarding mixing these parts? Lots of questions, I know, but any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks!!

Andy
Old 09-20-2004, 12:08 PM
  #15  
Teching In
 
BiggerJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default makin' a spinner

Originally Posted by Andy1
Big Tex,

Do you happen to know if the parts will actually interchange? Will the crank fit? Use the 4.8 rods (nice and long)? Do you happen to know what the combustion chamber volumes are of the stock 4.8 & 5.3 heads? Can you direct me to some of this kind of fundamental info regarding mixing these parts? Lots of questions, I know, but any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks!!

Andy
I am thinking about doing the same thing to my LS1. I want to take a stock LR4(4.8L) crank, and connecting rods and use my stock pistons. That would put me at a 312ci motor with a ~9.1:1 CR(ready for boost). If I wanted to stay NA I would likely switch the heads to LS6's to get the CR up to ~10:1. This way the parts are cheap and available. Anyone know what the limits of the LR4 rotating assembly are? I would like to spin the motor to 7-8k. I know the valvetrain would also have to be lightened/strengthend to get up there.
Old 09-20-2004, 01:49 PM
  #16  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Sport Side's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bigger J,

The only thing is your intake wont support that high of an rpm. Also, you'd have a very narrow powerband. You'd probably wanna think about one of those carb setups with the single/dual planes to spin the motor past 7k.

It would probably be a total track setup because you'd need a high stall converter to feed you into the desired power band.
Old 09-20-2004, 04:12 PM
  #17  
Teching In
 
BiggerJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3
Bigger J,

The only thing is your intake wont support that high of an rpm. Also, you'd have a very narrow powerband. You'd probably wanna think about one of those carb setups with the single/dual planes to spin the motor past 7k.
NA would be tricky at high rpms considering that the cam would probably also have to be optimized for high rpm. I figure I could use a turbo to make up for the stock LS1 intake/cam deficiencies. The LS6 or LS2 intake might give me some additional headroom.

Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3
It would probably be a total track setup because you'd need a high stall converter to feed you into the desired power band.
I have a 6spd so, I would have to put shorter gears in the rear to get my rpms up quickly.

Intake/Exhaust flow aside do you think the LR4 rotating assembly can handle 7-8k at modest torque (~400lb-ft)?
Old 09-20-2004, 04:13 PM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Andy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3
Bigger J,

The only thing is your intake wont support that high of an rpm. Also, you'd have a very narrow powerband. You'd probably wanna think about one of those carb setups with the single/dual planes to spin the motor past 7k.

It would probably be a total track setup because you'd need a high stall converter to feed you into the desired power band.
If you go stricktly by the calculations, an LS1 (346cu in) needs about 550 CFM @ 6500 RPM. The 312 cu in that BiggerJ talks about would need about 575 CFM @ 7500 RPM, so they're fairly close (using same constant for both). If he were to add the LS6 heads and intake, I would think he'd be in good shape.

BiggerJ, I'd advise you check for any required balancing of the rotating assembly when mixing parts. Any motor builders out there?

Andy
Old 09-20-2004, 04:29 PM
  #19  
Teching In
 
BiggerJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Andy1

BiggerJ, I'd advise you check for any required balancing of the rotating assembly when mixing parts. Any motor builders out there?

Andy
Kinda neglected that part. Does anyone know the difference in weight between the 4.8 vs 5.7 pistons? Since this is the only difference in the rotating assembly, would this difference in weight matter?(my guess is yes) Maybe custom pistons to match the 4.8's weight would be the easiest solution(I'd rather stay cheap). How expensive is it to get a stock crank rebalanced?
Old 09-20-2004, 09:54 PM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Andy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Balancing

Originally Posted by BiggerJ
Kinda neglected that part. Does anyone know the difference in weight between the 4.8 vs 5.7 pistons? Since this is the only difference in the rotating assembly, would this difference in weight matter?(my guess is yes) Maybe custom pistons to match the 4.8's weight would be the easiest solution(I'd rather stay cheap). How expensive is it to get a stock crank rebalanced?
Keep in mind. that the 4.8 rod is longer than the 5.7 (the longest of all the L motors, AFAIK), and probably weights more. The extra length is good for the rod ratio. Couple that with the bob weight of the piston, and therein lies the answer. You should probably direct your question(s) to a knowleagable L motor balance shop........and share the answers with us, of course!

Andy
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Oobray
8-Lug Truck Performance
70
06-13-2022 03:38 AM
bbowerman
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
10
07-26-2015 10:57 PM
Ammadien
New Members
1
07-22-2015 08:50 PM
4B11T
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
2
07-13-2015 03:48 PM
ferrellrooster
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
5
07-13-2015 09:53 AM



Quick Reply: 5.3 Flat Top Pistons-



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 AM.