4.8 flat tops in 5.3
#1
what would this do to performance. how much do you think it would bump up compression.do you think this would be a good combo with a nice cam tr224 or something like that.
Trending Topics
#8
Actually the 4.8L piston is a flat top, and the 5.3L is dished.
Reason: they both use the same head, but the 5.3 engines have a longer stroke than the 4.8L, so the 5.3L with the longer stroke would have had too much compression with a flat top piston.
Don't know how much the compression will increase using the 4.8's piston heads on a 5.3 though.
, but I know this:
-----5.3----------------------4.8------
bore X stroke-------------bore X stroke
3.779" x 3.622"-----------3.779" x 3.268"
Hopefully someone with a compression formula can use this.
Reason: they both use the same head, but the 5.3 engines have a longer stroke than the 4.8L, so the 5.3L with the longer stroke would have had too much compression with a flat top piston.
Don't know how much the compression will increase using the 4.8's piston heads on a 5.3 though.
, but I know this:-----5.3----------------------4.8------
bore X stroke-------------bore X stroke
3.779" x 3.622"-----------3.779" x 3.268"
Hopefully someone with a compression formula can use this.
Last edited by Tractionless; Jan 12, 2006 at 07:41 PM.
#9
TECH Junkie
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,271
Likes: 0
From: Katy, TX
Originally Posted by Tractionless
Actually the 4.8L piston is a flat top, and the 5.3L is dished.
Reason: they both use the same head, but the 5.3 engines have a longer stroke than the 4.8L, so the 5.3L with the longer stroke would have had too much compression with a flat top piston.
Don't know how much the compression will increase using the 4.8's piston heads on a 5.3 though.
, but I know this:
-----5.3----------------------4.8------
bore X stroke-------------bore X stroke
3.779" x 3.622"-----------3.779" x 3.27"
Hopefully someone with a compression formula can use this.
Reason: they both use the same head, but the 5.3 engines have a longer stroke than the 4.8L, so the 5.3L with the longer stroke would have had too much compression with a flat top piston.
Don't know how much the compression will increase using the 4.8's piston heads on a 5.3 though.
, but I know this:-----5.3----------------------4.8------
bore X stroke-------------bore X stroke
3.779" x 3.622"-----------3.779" x 3.27"
Hopefully someone with a compression formula can use this.

#10
Assuming:
7.5cc dish (5.3 piston....assuming it's the same as the 6.0 piston dish)
61cc chambers
.060" gasket (3.95" gasket bore)
9.5:1 CR
Calculating quickly it should be around 10.35:1 after the 4.8l piston swap.....
7.5cc dish (5.3 piston....assuming it's the same as the 6.0 piston dish)
61cc chambers
.060" gasket (3.95" gasket bore)
9.5:1 CR
Calculating quickly it should be around 10.35:1 after the 4.8l piston swap.....


