2000 Silverado 5.3 questions
12-30-2004, 06:54 AM
#12
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i say trailblazer converter and longtubes are great but expensive i might say some midlength headers and if you are going to mill the heads mine are 20 thousandths and i would not do that unless i went with a port and polish as far as the CR i think it is like 9.6 or .7 someone will correct me if im wrong which im not far off if i am and yes these things are beasts 
12-30-2004, 10:26 PM
#15
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cleveland Mississippi
Posts: 6,204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stang2841
what car isnt capable to keep up with these trucks?
12-30-2004, 10:27 PM
#16
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cleveland Mississippi
Posts: 6,204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2000_Silverado_SS
I don't think that car is even able to compete with these trucks.
12-31-2004, 07:02 PM
#17
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: palm harbor/tampa
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think that car is even able to compete with these trucks./quote
I bet anyday my car could run a 14.9 bone stock.. like what it says in your profile, and you have mods... dont get me wrong I like these trucks.. but thats saying a bit much..
I havent removed the valve covers on my car.. that has 110k miles and I'm running low 13's all day..
maybe you should do some researching before you go and say something like that
I bet anyday my car could run a 14.9 bone stock.. like what it says in your profile, and you have mods... dont get me wrong I like these trucks.. but thats saying a bit much..
I havent removed the valve covers on my car.. that has 110k miles and I'm running low 13's all day..
maybe you should do some researching before you go and say something like that
12-31-2004, 07:27 PM
#18
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cleveland Mississippi
Posts: 6,204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stang2841
I don't think that car is even able to compete with these trucks./quote
I bet anyday my car could run a 14.9 bone stock.. like what it says in your profile, and you have mods... dont get me wrong I like these trucks.. but thats saying a bit much..
I havent removed the valve covers on my car.. that has 110k miles and I'm running low 13's all day..
maybe you should do some researching before you go and say something like that
I bet anyday my car could run a 14.9 bone stock.. like what it says in your profile, and you have mods... dont get me wrong I like these trucks.. but thats saying a bit much..
I havent removed the valve covers on my car.. that has 110k miles and I'm running low 13's all day..
maybe you should do some researching before you go and say something like that
Can I get some info on your car? I got from an earlier post that it's a GT. What year model? So, no head work or cam upgrade. Bolt on? Power adder of any type? These guys aren't trying to start anything, just curious about a few things. Most bolt on mustangs we see don't go low 13s, so there's got to be something you're not telling us about. Not trying to start anything, but if you're low 13s, you should be well over 5 car lengths in front of your buds truck. He's most likely still in the 15s with just an air intake and true duals. Just putting the pieces together here.
12-31-2004, 07:43 PM
#19
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: palm harbor/tampa
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I got ... 3.73's , BBK shorties, BBK off road H, full MSD ignition,Edelbrock Performer RPM intake. 65mm throttlebody.. 75MMpro-m, densecharger intake. alot of weight savings
thats all I got off the top of my head, thats probablyonly about half of it
thats all I got off the top of my head, thats probablyonly about half of it