GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

2000 5.3 Dyno 235k Miles and bolt-ons

Old Oct 19, 2016 | 04:51 AM
  #11  
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,186
Likes: 106
From: FL
Default

I'd love to see some track times to go along with the dyno sheet. Not doubting the numbers, it's just nice to see both.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2016 | 05:17 AM
  #12  
JohnDaMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Sumter, SC
Default

Last time I went to Darlington it was 14.3 @ 95. That was before my tune
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2016 | 09:16 AM
  #13  
Merctech2's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 192
Likes: 21
Default

Nice numbers and track times, man I got to get mine to the track.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2016 | 03:56 PM
  #14  
BlueTexan24's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 152
Likes: 2
From: Weatherford, Texas
Default

I may have missed it, but is this a ecsb or a rcsb? That's a good et for those mods.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2016 | 04:16 PM
  #15  
JohnDaMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Sumter, SC
Default

RCSB, no spare, roll pan
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2016 | 08:14 AM
  #16  
JohnDaMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Sumter, SC
Default

The custom collector on my cheap stainless headers.





Reply
Old Oct 21, 2016 | 05:18 PM
  #17  
GM1697's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 12
From: in MA or SC
Default

thats pretty badass actually
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2016 | 05:24 PM
  #18  
JohnDaMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Sumter, SC
Default

Thanks man. That was a lot of time in research and work on those headers.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2016 | 08:54 PM
  #19  
Fast355's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 642
Likes: 21
From: Euless, TX
Default

Originally Posted by JohnDaMan
Are we talking about full throttle power or driving in general? The reason I ask is because this thread is titled dyno results of my 2000 Silverado.
Full throttle power and general driving. What I saw was a smoother power curve when the dyno software smoothing effect is reduced. Best way I can describe it is in speed density the power feels like it comes in waves, with the MAF on it is smoother overall. You can see far more dips and rises in speed density mode in the graph with less smoothing. I have even played with a MAF on a TBI 350 on one setup and it also ran much smoother on the MAF and made more average power. Throttle response is also noticeably better in my experience.

Last edited by Fast355; Oct 21, 2016 at 09:00 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2016 | 07:43 AM
  #20  
madmann26's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,985
Likes: 372
From: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
Default

Originally Posted by Fast355
Full throttle power and general driving. What I saw was a smoother power curve when the dyno software smoothing effect is reduced. Best way I can describe it is in speed density the power feels like it comes in waves, with the MAF on it is smoother overall. You can see far more dips and rises in speed density mode in the graph with less smoothing. I have even played with a MAF on a TBI 350 on one setup and it also ran much smoother on the MAF and made more average power. Throttle response is also noticeably better in my experience.
Just stop it. No one cares about you're TBI bullshit or your Express van.

Speed density has been proven time and time again.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:50 PM.