100mm MAF for LSX
Nov 26, 2006 | 08:56 AM
#22
Thread Starter
5 year bitches!
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Originally Posted by CRAZYCUTER4.8
Is he doing his own tuning? If not how will he compensate for the changes that will naturally occur with the ve table everytime the weather changes?
I am in no way knocking SD tuning, I am in SD now but evertime the weather changes your ve calculations are off. Plus the mathmatics for figuring the MAF is much more precise with a faster sampling rate (record the waves on a lab scope & play them back). If speed density only was the way to go
then i find it hard to believe GM would not have gone to MAF+SD.
I am in no way knocking SD tuning, I am in SD now but evertime the weather changes your ve calculations are off. Plus the mathmatics for figuring the MAF is much more precise with a faster sampling rate (record the waves on a lab scope & play them back). If speed density only was the way to go
then i find it hard to believe GM would not have gone to MAF+SD.
Nov 26, 2006 | 10:35 AM
#23
Originally Posted by CRAZYCUTER4.8
you are 100% correct in that regard.
They are talking about deleting the MAF all together. In that case there would be no IAT sensor.
They are talking about deleting the MAF all together. In that case there would be no IAT sensor.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lucas287
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
31
Jan 12, 2021 06:18 AM
