GM Drivetrain & Suspension Chassis | Transmission| Driveshaft | Gears/Rear End/Differential | Traction Aids

Coilovers ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 2, 2014 | 11:48 AM
  #11  
GREENSIERRA's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 69
From: Canada
Default

here is my brothers 92 setup with strong arms and coilovers, I do believe they are adjustable QA1

Name:  IMG_20140216_082612_zpse07d28f8.jpg
Views: 530
Size:  79.2 KB

Name:  IMG_20140216_164142_zpsceeb5931.jpg
Views: 517
Size:  78.5 KB
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2014 | 11:13 PM
  #12  
Blown06's Avatar
8 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,662
Likes: 47
Default

I weighed the lower arms and called ridetech to get a weight. They could only give me the shipping weight. But based on that, it looks like there is only a few pounds difference, unless the packaging is really heavy.

Probably no savings on the upper arms.

The weight advantage is gonna be in the spring. That ****** is heavy.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2014 | 09:08 AM
  #13  
BigKID's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,947
Likes: 242
From: Panama City, Fl
Default

That is about the same information I have gotten from RideTech. I spoke with a rep at a race and he didn't know the exact weight but speculated they wouldn't be much lighter than the stock stamped steel lca.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2014 | 09:56 AM
  #14  
slowec's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,062
Likes: 0
From: Brunswick, Ga
Default

I like to keep things to weekend projects. I drive my truck to work 4 days a week. Don't think I am ready for four link yet.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2014 | 04:21 AM
  #15  
Noah Burns's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 3
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by 6.0l RST
wouldnt a good universal 4link kit help to just eliminate the leafs?
in the most perfect of worlds, yes it would... and I've considered doing it on my 2014 but I can't justify that kind of modification on a 10 month old truck that will see limited track use.

but yes, that would work
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2014 | 09:21 AM
  #16  
dubwise's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Blown06
I am currently making the ridetech strong arms and an afco double adjustable coilover conversion on my truck. No pics yet.
Interested to hear more about this.. You plan on using the afco shocks with conical springs, or whats the plan for the upper mount?
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2014 | 10:57 PM
  #17  
Blown06's Avatar
8 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,662
Likes: 47
Default

The entire stock upper spring bucket is getting cut off the frame. I'll be fabbing an upper mount.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2014 | 06:24 AM
  #18  
slowec's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,062
Likes: 0
From: Brunswick, Ga
Default

Why the extensive fabbing? I would think you could just mount the bottom of a coilover to your strong arm and beef up the upper mount and ride? why cut the whole upper off? Weight savings???
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2014 | 01:01 PM
  #19  
ShredSled's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 789
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by slowec
Why the extensive fabbing? I would think you could just mount the bottom of a coilover to your strong arm and beef up the upper mount and ride? why cut the whole upper off? Weight savings???
He may want to dial in his eye-to-eye distance for optimal travel. Also you can ditch the weak stem mount and go to a more common dual shear style mount.

Search around. There are several threads on this topic here and quite a few members currently running 2wd with coilovers up front.

The coilover in rear combined with leafsprings would be completely redundant and not work well together. It's pointless.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2014 | 02:19 PM
  #20  
fastnblu's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by BigKID
Ideally you want a double adjustable shock up front for drag racing set for a light rebound for easy front end rise and firm compression to keep the front up so it doesn't drop quickly and unload the rear. Alot of single adjustables, such as ridetech, have rebound adjustment only with a fixed compression. This can also work in drag racing if the fixed compression is stiff enough. The thing I like about the ridetech/fox is the adjustment **** on the end of the shaft which would end up in the engine bay for easy adjustment. Strong arms really are not needed with the right t-bar and a little modification to the stock control arm. They would make it nice for using a standard eye mount shock and more open area for adjustment access for shocks with lower mounted *****.
I do not see any benefit of using a coil over with leaf springs. The only way I see it working is if you use a mono-leaf for location only and use a lighter spring on the coilover. This would provide a little more height adjustment but I am not sure how the different spring rates of the leaf and coils would play together.
The actual weight difference of the strong arms vs stock control arms is likely greater on older platforms ('88-98) that utilized solid UCA & LCA's. As we got newer platform trucks, weight benefit is likely diminished / non existent, since they're darn near tubular not solid.

Blown06, what was your stock LCA weight? Ridetech ship weight of same?

slow, while u may not wanna do 4 link, just coilovers by themselves would be better for racing I'd think than 2 diff spring setups at same time, due to sheer weight alone. Plenty of fast leaf vehicles on lil tire, & fast on coilovers (4 link too) but not all at same time.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 PM.