Notices
GM Drivetrain & Suspension Chassis | Transmission| Driveshaft | Gears/Rear End/Differential | Traction Aids

60E vs 80E

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2009, 05:49 PM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
00Silv4.8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 3,278
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have found that I CAN NOT tune.. haha it just doesnt work. I've tried with HPTuners and from what I understand EFI is WAY easier, but I rather take my **** to a pro, have him dick with it, put it on the dyno and know Im getting the most for the money. And if anything goes wrong, not my fault
Old 05-03-2009, 05:51 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

EFI live is awesome. You gotta start sometime, why not now. At least that's what I said. There's absolutely no reason I can't learn to tune as well as a professional.
Old 05-03-2009, 05:55 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Jeteys5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

would a 5.3 with a radix be better off with a 4l80e? or would that be a slug? i see the comparison with the 4l80e here was used with a 6.0.......
Old 05-03-2009, 05:59 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jeteys5.3
would a 5.3 with a radix be better off with a 4l80e? or would that be a slug? i see the comparison with the 4l80e here was used with a 6.0.......
The point was that the gearing and parasitic losses of the 80e versus the 60e cancelled out the increased power output of the 6.0 versus that of the 5.3
Old 05-03-2009, 06:06 PM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
00Silv4.8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 3,278
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
The point was that the gearing and parasitic losses of the 80e versus the 60e cancelled out the increased power output of the 6.0 versus that of the 5.3
And at the same time I dont believe that.

The dyno will read a little low, so what. There was a guy who started a thread that did a back to back comparison. He ran something like a 13.5 with the 60, swapped the 80 and ran like a 13.4. I think the "parasitic" loss with a stronger trans is . Dyno numbers are like measuring your dick.. dont mean **** if you've got 9" but dont know how to use it
Old 05-03-2009, 07:55 PM
  #16  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
L7 Sierra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chino Hills, Ca
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well I was figuring I will get atleast 4.11's so the 80 won't bog at all with those gears, and I will probily end up with 275/60/17's to stay cheap.

I am going to end up re-building this truck atleast once and I wondered if it was just me who does not like wide ratio's.

Also a well built 60 would more then likely survive all my plans for the truck, as I plan to get my camaro running bigger and better then ever here soon enough.

And I measure my dick from the crack of my *** to get the maximum length.
Old 05-04-2009, 12:03 AM
  #17  
12 Second Truck Club
 
marlboroman71818's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Crosby TX
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you ask someone and they tell you the 60 is better than the 80 then they have more than likely never experienced the difference in the two or just got lucky and got that 1 in 1000th 60 that just wont quit. Ask anyone who has gone to the 80 if they would ever go back to a 60. You have your answer.
Old 05-04-2009, 12:28 AM
  #18  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
00Silv4.8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 3,278
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by L7 Sierra
And I measure my dick from the crack of my *** to get the maximum length.
I was waiting for a comment better than mine
Old 05-04-2009, 11:57 AM
  #19  
TECH Resident
 
oldred95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Enid, OK
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by marlboroman71818
If you ask someone and they tell you the 60 is better than the 80 then they have more than likely never experienced the difference in the two or just got lucky and got that 1 in 1000th 60 that just wont quit. Ask anyone who has gone to the 80 if they would ever go back to a 60. You have your answer.
Agreed.

I love the tighter gear ratios and higher 1st and 2nd gears of the 4L80E. Being able to catch 2nd on a 70 mph kick down and running it up to 90 is great for passing. The only thing I don't love is the low OD ratio but really its not too awful bad. It pulls hills effortlessly so in the end it probably equals out and what little fuel economy it may loose on flat ground by turning unecessary rpms it makes up for when it comes to hills.
Old 05-04-2009, 12:09 PM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
KySilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I'll also add that I've run a best ET. No changes other than the 60e to 80e swap.


Quick Reply: 60E vs 80E



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 AM.