FUEL SYSTEMS For things such as pumps, lines, set-ups, line routing, fuel cell mounting, etc.,etc....all fuel related discussions!

Pump suggestions for boosted 03 LQ4?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 01:36 PM
  #1  
HDGMC11's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default Pump suggestions for boosted 03 LQ4?

2003 Sierra 2500HD 6.0L
Magnuson TVS1900 w/ 9lb pulley & 42lb injectors
Stock Delphi in-tank fuel pump
Also has the in-line pump that Magnuson supplies for 03 models only...

I'm not getting enough fuel and leaning out too much around 4500rpm.

What would you do? Upgrade in-tank with Walbro GSS340 and hotwire kit and leave the in-line there? Or upgrade the in-tank and remove the in-line? I do have a GSS340 (pump only) that came with my kit for 04-06 models but it doesn't look the same as my stock 03 in-tank pump setup....there's 2 hoses in the stock pump, only one in the 340...

If I remove the inline and install the Racetronix suggested parts list below, will that be enough?
Pump Drop In - Racetronix - FPM-007 - Fuel Module, GM SUV, High Perf. Type 007
Hotwire Kit - Racetronix - FPWH-001 - Fuel Pump Wiring Harness, 98-03 SUV


Any input will be appreciated!
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 02:20 PM
  #2  
gearheaddrew's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Default

That module and wiring harness to handle the additional current will work in that setup nicely.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 05:13 PM
  #3  
zblee's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 273
Likes: 3
Default

With the 255 in tank module you have in your link, you will not need a hotwire kit. at least I have not with mine. BUT, i think that you will need more than a 255lph pump. I believe a 400/450 will be needed. I currently have that same exact drop in pump in your link in my 03 and I plan on upgrading to a 450 in preparation for for boost. I will also be installing a hotwire kit when i bump up the pump to a 450

_Zblee
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2016 | 11:27 AM
  #4  
flatblack83's Avatar
TECH Regular
10 Year Member
Loved
Liked
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 408
Likes: 29
Default

I had the same setup on my 2500hd a few months ago. I swapped out the inline since it's a 190 for a 255 and changed the injectors to 60s. (That was with a 2.8 pulley) Now that I have a cam and 2.7 pulley i removed all of it and did an intank 450, racetronix harness and external fuel regulator.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2016 | 01:58 PM
  #5  
HDGMC11's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flatblack83
I had the same setup on my 2500hd a few months ago. I swapped out the inline since it's a 190 for a 255 and changed the injectors to 60s. (That was with a 2.8 pulley) Now that I have a cam and 2.7 pulley i removed all of it and did an intank 450, racetronix harness and external fuel regulator.
Did you need to switch out to 60# or was that just to be safe?

Racetronix said they can set me up with that same unit I linked to but with a 340lph upgrade. I think that's the route I'm gonna go, then take out the magnuson supplied in-line, and upgrade to 60# if the injectors are then the limiting factor
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2016 | 02:34 PM
  #6  
flatblack83's Avatar
TECH Regular
10 Year Member
Loved
Liked
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 408
Likes: 29
Default

The injectors my brother got with a camaro he bought to return to stock, so they were free...lol. With doing the cam I wanted to prepare with all the fueling needs. Not sure if I really needed them but 60s I was told more than once to go with.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Funkster
GM Parts Classifieds
22
Jun 3, 2016 04:26 PM
cj847
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
8
Apr 26, 2016 06:54 AM
VTJosh
GM Parts Classifieds
26
Apr 22, 2016 02:34 AM
Blt2tuk
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
2
Mar 3, 2016 10:51 AM
00 silver toy
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
4
May 11, 2002 12:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13 AM.