if i did it again id probably go with a fuel lab FPR few guys on here are running them

 

i like aeromotive cause their like 200 cheeper..

 

Umm, no. That would mean they payed me to run a fuelab. Mine was similar price as Aeromotive.

 

What about the Aeromotive 13101? Isn't that their high capacity EFI regulator? Cost is $165. -10 ORB in and -6 ORB out. That was the one I was planning to run.

 

the ones i looked at that had -8s was around 300$

 

Mine has -10's and was mid to upper $1xx

Edit- this. http://m.summitracing.com/parts/fue-51501-1

 

look around on ebay i found my 13129 aeromotive for pretty cheap $129 iirc think the fuel lab was around $150

one other thing the fuel lab FPR has over the aeromotive is mine is only good till 70psi the fuel lab is good till 90psi

 

Why is everybody so hung up over the size of the ports on the regulator?

1st off, 95% or more of people on here would do just fine with -6 return. Secondly, resistance and flowrate is directly related to length of the pipe/line. So, one small area of -6 isn't even going to matter if you run -8 the rest of the way to the bucket.

 

I have run both the aeromotive and the fuelab. Both at -10/-6. Both work just fine. The comments about the return, as long as your return line is kink free and as simple as possible it will work just fine. If not you may have slight issues trying to run low pressure which will cause it to be really rich. For example on a hard decel i pull 20-25 vacuum both regulators pull the fuel pressure down just fine. Previously i was having some issues when my return line had several fittings and was snaked all over the place which caused super rich decel conditions. . Reading up on fuelabs forum, not being able to run low fuel pressure on decel was usually due to the return line being retarded.

 

Think ill go with aeromotive 13129 just have to use these adapters
-8 to -6

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/fra-184507/overview/
^^^^^^