tundra 1/4's
09-25-2011, 08:13 PM
#15
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: gonzales, louisiana
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think with trac off and stab off and launching/ shifting right a rcsb can get into mid 13s.
I work on them they are preety impressive. I should have got one but I bought a 11gmc instead
I work on them they are preety impressive. I should have got one but I bought a 11gmc instead
09-26-2011, 04:50 PM
#16
Staging Lane
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RCSB- 13.8-14.2 N/A 12.8-13.0 S/C
Double Cab- 14.5-14.8 N/A 13.0-13.3 S/C
Crewmax- 14.8- 15.2 N/A 13.3-13.5 S/C
And we trap anywhere from 95-97 stock N/A and 106-108 S/C. However there are a few factory freaks out there that runner faster than they should. But I'm sure that's with any brand.
Double Cab- 14.5-14.8 N/A 13.0-13.3 S/C
Crewmax- 14.8- 15.2 N/A 13.3-13.5 S/C
And we trap anywhere from 95-97 stock N/A and 106-108 S/C. However there are a few factory freaks out there that runner faster than they should. But I'm sure that's with any brand.
12-14-2011, 10:54 AM
#18
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When my dc 4x4 tundra tundra was stock I had to struggle with the right 2wd launch to even get into the 14s with the electronic nannies holding everything back. I could launch in 4wd and be in the low 14s. Keep in mind that now with mods on the tundra I have seen as low as a 13.8 on the g tech with consistent bottom 14s.
The deal with the tundra is that it will come out of the hole (off the line) very hard on a 4wd launch, but not do anything all too impressive after that (compared to other comparable full sized trucks). That coming out of the hole would really make my silverado look stupid racing off the line against a tundra launching in 4wd (gtech 6.1 for silverado and 5.0 for tundra to 60) and that explains the 1 second difference in the quarter for trucks that accelerate about the same after that.
My siverado with the 6.2 will not come out of the hole (off the line) very well, but will hold it's own (if not beat) the tundra after that. The best gtech I have on my silverado is a 14.8 and that is with a vararam intake, ported tb, and 87 octane diabloport tune. I would expect it to be slightly better on the 92 octane tune, but not more than 2-3 tenths. I'm generally pretty disappointed in the silverados performance so far...as it is 200 lbs lighter than the tundra so I might have to get a set of long tubes and a real dyno tune to get to where I want to be at the mid to high 13s in the silverado.
The deal with the tundra is that it will come out of the hole (off the line) very hard on a 4wd launch, but not do anything all too impressive after that (compared to other comparable full sized trucks). That coming out of the hole would really make my silverado look stupid racing off the line against a tundra launching in 4wd (gtech 6.1 for silverado and 5.0 for tundra to 60) and that explains the 1 second difference in the quarter for trucks that accelerate about the same after that.
My siverado with the 6.2 will not come out of the hole (off the line) very well, but will hold it's own (if not beat) the tundra after that. The best gtech I have on my silverado is a 14.8 and that is with a vararam intake, ported tb, and 87 octane diabloport tune. I would expect it to be slightly better on the 92 octane tune, but not more than 2-3 tenths. I'm generally pretty disappointed in the silverados performance so far...as it is 200 lbs lighter than the tundra so I might have to get a set of long tubes and a real dyno tune to get to where I want to be at the mid to high 13s in the silverado.
