FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Who's the Dyno Queen now....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 08:48 PM
  #61  
Wilde Racing's Avatar
How do I change this text
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,294
Likes: 2
From: Behind the TIG welder
Default

Originally Posted by Rick@Synergy
BTW, why are we comparing diesels to gas ENGINES?

R
Good point, Because the fact that diesels don't have spark plugs, the air flow dynamics are COMPLETELY different
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 12:42 AM
  #62  
vanillagorilla's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 1
From: Arizona Bay
Default

I've always got hung up on the fact that a turbo is a huge exaust restriction, and superchargers hate restrictive exhausts. You could put a huge A/R housing on it, but then you run the risk of the supercharger being done and the turbo not being fully spooled yet. I think with a gas engine, you'd have crazy EGT's with twin charging without some sort of bypass valves or something.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 02:13 AM
  #63  
Spoolin's Avatar
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

Originally Posted by vanillagorilla
I...You could put a huge A/R housing on it, but then you run the risk of the supercharger being done and the turbo not being fully spooled yet.
The cool thing about compound system is a turbo would spool much quicker than it did without a SC because of the increase airflow provided by the blower at much lower RPM's. If a turbo hit max boost at 5K on itself, it's be realistic to think it'd spool in the high 3K's due to all the added airflow and exhaust gasses provided at lower RPM's by the SC.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 07:06 AM
  #64  
zippy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
There are a lot of similarities between gas and diesels, the venerable pt-88 turbo is derived from the detriot diesel. Diesels make more of idle tq then a comparable ci gas motor but boost characteristics are much the same. My comparison of the twin setup was mearly to illustrate that if you use two compressors with entirely different efficiency ranges that big power and good egts/iats are possible despite an "enefficient" compressor in the system. I think the with the new TVS blowers that the gains by adding a turbo on top of it would net minimal gains due to their great efficiency.
I sure wouldn't say diesels make great off idle torque. It may look like it when they are dyno'd, but only when you just look at the chart. Take a diesel to the track and launch it off idle. You'd be lucky to get a 60' time of less than a 2.2-2.3. Until they come into boost there isn't much for power at all. The sequential turbo system works out very nice in the way of making very quick boost and yet still flow enough air to make the hp in the higher rpm (higher airflow demand). They are however more complicated and are considerably more prone to problems. As for running a supercharger with a turbo, you're just asking for more heat. This is the reason that no other companies do this. If you look at the famous Detroit diesel you'd see just how big of a blower they used just to keep the blower from being a restrition to the turbo. There is no best of both worlds. You either get the efficiency of a turbo with some lag or you get the parasitic drag of a blower. The only big way around this is alot of cubes. Then you have alot of power even when not in boost, unfortunatly with no fuel milage to match.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 08:21 AM
  #65  
TrickTurbo's Avatar
Truck Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,466
Likes: 62
From: Wichita Falls Tx.
Default

Nitrous and Turbo, great off line performance, and great top end. But there is that thing of getting greeeeedyyyyy on the bottle.
They even have progressive controllers to trim the nitrous back as the boost comes up.

The only way to put the hole compound thing to bed is for someone to do it. Post the results good or bad..

I think the chart shows nice low end. And lets face it; you can give up a little in the begining if you have a few hundred extra at the end.

Rick sorry but the thread looks like it took a turn.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 09:03 AM
  #66  
Wilde Racing's Avatar
How do I change this text
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,294
Likes: 2
From: Behind the TIG welder
Default

Originally Posted by zippy
If you look at the famous Detroit diesel you'd see just how big of a blower they used just to keep the blower from being a restrition to the turbo.
It was so big because IT had to supply the air so the engine would run.


take a 408 with 8.0 scr. install a pt-88 turbo on it, make it build 20-25 psi of boost What are you IAT going to be?

Take the same 408 and turbo, install a Radix. Run the radix with the largest pully you can find so your boost would be 4-6 psi from that alone. Then the turbo would only have to build about 10-15 psi to hit you 25psi goal. What does the IATs of a pt-88 at 15 psi and a radix at 5 psi look like?

If some one would like to buy my 10-1 pistons off me, I'll gladly order 8-1's and put this to bed...
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 02:17 PM
  #67  
Spoolin's Avatar
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

Originally Posted by Wilde Racing
...If some one would like to buy my 10-1 pistons off me, I'll gladly order 8-1's and put this to bed...

Get in line buster, I was here first!
I think you and I have an ideal system for trying this out in any case. Better than front mounts or pro-charged as seen in one recent application.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 02:39 PM
  #68  
stock48's Avatar
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 5
From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin
Get in line buster, I was here first!
I think you and I have an ideal system for trying this out in any case. Better than front mounts or pro-charged as seen in one recent application.
You have no traction though
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 03:17 PM
  #69  
kbracing96's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,485
Likes: 31
From: Oakland, OR
Default

If some one wants to loan me a Radix for a couple month, I will gladly test it on my new motor (9.25 to 1 forged ls1).
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 04:18 PM
  #70  
ForcedTQ's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: Northern CA
Default

Originally Posted by zippy
The sequential turbo system works out very nice in the way of making very quick boost and yet still flow enough air to make the hp in the higher rpm (higher airflow demand). They are however more complicated and are considerably more prone to problems. As for running a supercharger with a turbo, you're just asking for more heat. This is the reason that no other companies do this.
Brainstorm, How about adding a bypass circuit for the turbo into the intake plenum of the engine with a valve that is set to open once the supercharger is out of its efficient range. It would probably also be wise to install an electronically activated "slipper" clutch on the pulley of the super charger to de-couple/re-couple it from/to the serpentine belt without shocking the bearings and rotors.

To address EGT, set up a bypass circuit in the exhaust that activates on EGT, backpressure, and RPM of the motor. Just make sure there is a minimum flow of exhaust through the Turbo side to keep it spinning.

Just a few thoughts.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:53 PM.