While we are reviewing cams.....
#11
I'm thinking that the present lift also exceeded the recommended max for the stainless valves that were originally installed in the heads. Original build sheet listed lifts as .5XX, which is where they would have been with 1.7 rockers. The difference turned out to be exactly the difference between a 1.7 and the 1.8 (LS7 style) rockers that were used.
So what would be the ideal characteristics of a head for this application?
So what would be the ideal characteristics of a head for this application?
#12
i have the cathedral mast heads and my cam is split as well since the exhaust port is ls7 based...something to think about
#13
I'm thinking that the present lift also exceeded the recommended max for the stainless valves that were originally installed in the heads. Original build sheet listed lifts as .5XX, which is where they would have been with 1.7 rockers. The difference turned out to be exactly the difference between a 1.7 and the 1.8 (LS7 style) rockers that were used.
So what would be the ideal characteristics of a head for this application?
So what would be the ideal characteristics of a head for this application?
#14
That's a big valve. I was looking at various heads and one of them did not recommend stainless with over something like .613 lift. Could have been PRC, but not certain. What springs/spring pressures with those?
#15
it is a big valve on a big head, they are the 295cc mast heads
curious if you had simialr heads what was your pushrod lenght? mine are 8" with my tie bar lifters
#16
Current build sheet says TFS-21408050 (8.050") Pretty sure what I just pulled out was the Trick Flows. Non tie bar Morel hydraulic rollers.
#17
that makes some sense, my lifters require only .030 preload and my block was decked
8" long
3/8" thick
.134 wall thickness
wonder if your setup was flexing those pushrods, said anything over 7.5 ya should have 3/8 if you have the clearance especially with that valve train
8" long
3/8" thick
.134 wall thickness
wonder if your setup was flexing those pushrods, said anything over 7.5 ya should have 3/8 if you have the clearance especially with that valve train
#18
Are you running stock rockers? The problem tends to be in the way the rockers pull at the valves over certain lift. The LS7 style rockers done have the same problem until much higher lift numbers.
George that exactly my point on the cam. It's not the split specifically i don't like, it's that the exhaust open is far too late for these heads. Especially at his boost level.
George that exactly my point on the cam. It's not the split specifically i don't like, it's that the exhaust open is far too late for these heads. Especially at his boost level.
#20
Seems that many feel that my spring pressures were too low for 20 PSI/7000 RPM...currently at 155/450




