FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Relocation of MAF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 11:56 AM
  #31  
Whippled 496's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 1
From: Lake Shore, MD
Default

Originally Posted by 04ChargedSS
OK, I was thinking about this all day yesterday and now I'm really confused.

If the same air flow velocity is going into the charger as that which is being pumped from the charger......why doesn't the MAF work in both locations?
I was thinking about this as well. Wouldnt a "Pressure washer" be a good analogy here? You hook it up to your outside hose bib, which generally has about 40psi. Yet when you squeeze the trigger your getting a blast of water much greater than the input of the garden hose. You have no more water going into the machine, it just takes what is goes in and forces it out at a higher velocity. Could be wrong here, but it sounds good.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 02:23 PM
  #32  
Mort's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,120
Likes: 0
Cool

Pressure Washer - well sort of. The difference is that the compressor actually creates a vacuum and sucks more air into itself which it can then compress and put out to the engine. The engine gets more air than it would be able to draw in NA. In order for more air to be available the compressor must draw more air in than the pistons can on their own. Boost is really a measure of resistance. The compressor draws in air and tries to force it into the engine. The intake manifold and heads can only flow so much and the pistons can only suck so much so the air backs up and creates pressure inside the intake manifold. Meanwhile it is pushing all the air it can into the combustion chambers controlled by the wastegate. No air is lost once it enters the compressor (or at least it shouldn't be lost) so it does not matter if you mount the MAF before or after the compressor from that point of view. The MAF will see the same amount of air being sucked through it if mounted in front of the compressor as it will see being forced through it if mounted after the compressor.

What does change is the heat in the air generated as a by-product of the operation of the compressor or compressor/IC combination. The action of the compressor trying to force the air into the engine creates heat. Hot air contains less air molecules than colder air and the MAF will try to adjust its readings to account for the heat in the air if you put it after the compressor. The actual A/F ratio will need to be measured by a wideband O2 and the tune adjusted to take this into account. Whenever you change the location of the MAF from before the compressor to after the compressor or visa versa the A/F ratio should be checked and the tune adjusted for any changes.

In general most positive displacement and centrifugal superchargers run the MAF in the stockish position and measure air being pulled through the MAF. Most turbos (well at least the STS ones) run the MAF after the compressor and measure the air after it is compressed.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 02:39 PM
  #33  
Whippled 496's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 1
From: Lake Shore, MD
Default

okay, got it. I kept my MAF in the stock location and installed the open air IAT sensor in the elbow just before it dumps into the manifold. This way it reads the compressed air but after the intercooler.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 03:05 PM
  #34  
04ChargedSS's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Tri Valley area, NorCal
Default

Whippled 496- Good analogy! That's exactly how I figured the chareger was working....guess not. But good one just the same!!

Mort- Thanks for the detailed explination, I was begining to go nuts with this...as I am nuts enough already, this was making my head hurt

So, MikeGyver- now you know Get the tune set up for it and it should work right for you.....
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 03:39 PM
  #35  
MikeGyver's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,515
Likes: 242
From: Suburban Chicago
Default

Ok, I've got the pressure washer mounted, I just have to figure out what size pulley to use. Do you guys think I should mount the nozzle before or after the intercooler?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 03:58 PM
  #36  
Superado's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 2
From: Dallas, Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by MikeGyver
I expect 300 additional WHP.
300rwhp?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 04:17 PM
  #37  
MikeGyver's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,515
Likes: 242
From: Suburban Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Superado
300rwhp?
400, with the pressure washer.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 04:23 PM
  #38  
Superado's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 2
From: Dallas, Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by MikeGyver
400, with the pressure washer.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 04:56 PM
  #39  
04ChargedSS's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Tri Valley area, NorCal
Default

Originally Posted by MikeGyver
Ok, I've got the pressure washer mounted, I just have to figure out what size pulley to use. Do you guys think I should mount the nozzle before or after the intercooler?
Originally Posted by MikeGyver
400, with the pressure washer.


I wonder if that would be considered water injection?
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 12:01 AM
  #40  
Whippled 496's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 1
From: Lake Shore, MD
Default

Originally Posted by MikeGyver
400, with the pressure washer.
Man, you guys F'in kill me. Mike make sure to use nothing less than a 2200psi. Using the formula 1psi = 20rwhp....that should net you someplace around 44,000rwhp. In a 6000lb truck that should put you across the 1/4 mile mark in just under 3 seconds @ 455mph.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 AM.