FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

procharge or turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2005, 12:04 AM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
 
BeefTip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere between Auburn, AL and Columbus, GA
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by F8L Z71
To an extent yes but most smaller turbo kits will see full boost by 300rpm or lower if a front mount.

yeah but the gt35 doesnt even see it that soon....its close to a magna or some twin screw but come on..i still am a fan of most turbos...of course, im in love with the new 2 112s by blown chevy
Old 12-05-2005, 09:43 AM
  #32  
12 Second Truck Club
 
F8L Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know, I'm just saying that compared to a normal centrifugal the full boost comes on sooner and hits harder so it's more livable without a converter. I used to drive a Vortech blown 87' 351 Mustang for years.

On our LSx based motors almost any form of FI would benifit from a stall. LOL
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chopperloco
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
15
07-10-2016 10:45 PM
D1SCSS
GM Parts Classifieds
44
01-25-2016 10:14 PM
JCW
FORCED INDUCTION
14
09-22-2015 03:59 PM
rebel_within
FORCED INDUCTION
7
08-25-2015 11:49 AM
fcompean
FORCED INDUCTION
21
07-15-2015 09:55 PM



Quick Reply: procharge or turbo?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 AM.