Magnuson 112/112H info.........
08-07-2007, 09:13 AM
#12
Originally Posted by ZO6Ted
So at pump gas boost levels it seems that on the 4.8 or 5.3 the standard 112 may be currently the most efficient, and therefore the best choice?
That is a broad statement and I feel answering a Yes or No would be biased in one way or another. HOWEVER in a street truck I feel the choice is a 112 to maximize the "power under the curve" based on the data provided.
08-07-2007, 09:26 AM
#13
TECH Junkie
Originally Posted by krambo
That is a broad statement and I feel answering a Yes or No would be biased in one way or another. HOWEVER in a street truck I feel the choice is a 112 to maximize the "power under the curve" based on the data provided.
08-07-2007, 10:27 AM
#14
I see one thing in there very interesting, if you look at the 5500 RPM line and compare data it is impressive to say the least. There is proof that the propaganda posted on the web about cooler discharge from a screw is just that, propaganda. What should be noted is these are all EO Street legal systems.
08-07-2007, 05:39 PM
#15
Originally Posted by BlownChevy
I see one thing in there very interesting, if you look at the 5500 RPM line and compare data it is impressive to say the least. There is proof that the propaganda posted on the web about cooler discharge from a screw is just that, propaganda. What should be noted is these are all EO Street legal systems.
sure seems to me like the best blower in this group for this engine would be the 112 if your going to keep it limited to ~10psi peek.
08-07-2007, 05:44 PM
#16
Originally Posted by parish8
cant argue with that. if the whipple was making the same boost as the 112 at 5500rpm the whipple would be even hotter
sure seems to me like the best blower in this group for this engine would be the 112 if your going to keep it limited to ~10psi peek.
sure seems to me like the best blower in this group for this engine would be the 112 if your going to keep it limited to ~10psi peek.
I am starting to think that over 13-14 psi the MP112 is suffering from lack of intercooler. Remember the Lighting guys are running 15-16 psi on a less efficient EATON 112 and seeing lower IAT/Discharge temps than the Magnuson part. The only difference is the intercooler core.
08-08-2007, 12:17 PM
#18
Originally Posted by BlownChevy
Who said it was a whipple
I am starting to think that over 13-14 psi the MP112 is suffering from lack of intercooler. Remember the Lighting guys are running 15-16 psi on a less efficient EATON 112 and seeing lower IAT/Discharge temps than the Magnuson part. The only difference is the intercooler core.
I am starting to think that over 13-14 psi the MP112 is suffering from lack of intercooler. Remember the Lighting guys are running 15-16 psi on a less efficient EATON 112 and seeing lower IAT/Discharge temps than the Magnuson part. The only difference is the intercooler core.
