Do you happen to have any data comparing the 112 to the 122 blowers?

That is a broad statement and I feel answering a Yes or No would be biased in one way or another. HOWEVER in a street truck I feel the choice is a 112 to maximize the "power under the curve" based on the data provided.

Thanks krambo, coming from someone with an 11 second truck, your opinion counts alot.

I see one thing in there very interesting, if you look at the 5500 RPM line and compare data it is impressive to say the least. There is proof that the propaganda posted on the web about cooler discharge from a screw is just that, propaganda. What should be noted is these are all EO Street legal systems.

cant argue with that. if the whipple was making the same boost as the 112 at 5500rpm the whipple would be even hotter

sure seems to me like the best blower in this group for this engine would be the 112 if your going to keep it limited to ~10psi peek.

Who said it was a whipple

I am starting to think that over 13-14 psi the MP112 is suffering from lack of intercooler. Remember the Lighting guys are running 15-16 psi on a less efficient EATON 112 and seeing lower IAT/Discharge temps than the Magnuson part. The only difference is the intercooler core.

great info, awsome test fixture.

do you the core in the manifold or the core out front in the grill?

Like the lighting, the intercooler core is in the manifold with a front mount heat exchanger.

This piece?