FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS Power!! Twin 76mm Turbo 4.8L 1200HP & still going!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 09:03 PM
  #41  
03regcab sierra's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 776
Likes: 2
From: seminole tx
Default

Originally Posted by 00ChevyScott
unless you're planning on running a ton of boost, why would you stick with a 4.8? Don't forget how much power other guys are making N/A with 6.0s
I have looked into alot of the 6.0l n/a and boosted engines but from looking at this article and foose04 wats the point of goin bigger motor when u can just up the boost on a 4.8l. Im not gonna be goin crazy on my build but with my mp76 ported heads and boost cam I sure hope to get to a 500rwhp mark.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 09:05 PM
  #42  
swift700's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 938
Likes: 2
From: Calgary
Default

Higher octane doesn't have more energy. It just releases it slower for a longer and more controlled burn.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 09:07 PM
  #43  
charcold-bowtie's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,198
Likes: 0
From: Midland Texas
Default

I have doubts it could ever make a 1/4 mile pass. Impressive, although.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 09:08 PM
  #44  
gavin2005's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: baxley,ga
Default

Originally Posted by 03regcab sierra
I have looked into alot of the 6.0l n/a and boosted engines but from looking at this article and foose04 wats the point of goin bigger motor when u can just up the boost on a 4.8l. Im not gonna be goin crazy on my build but with my mp76 ported heads and boost cam I sure hope to get to a 500rwhp mark.
you can make 500rwhp fairly easy on 10psi with the 4.8 and unported heads
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2011 | 06:14 AM
  #45  
LS1FREEK's Avatar
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 8
From: Sublette, KS
Default

Originally Posted by foose04
228/230, big stick for a 4.8L. I question why in the world go with a 112 LSA cam though.
I think thats how they keep the motor together! Remember, torque is what kills all things mechanical on a vehicle... You get a 112 with big duration like that cam, even on boost, its gonna be all high rpm power, if they would have tried to make 1200 hp at 5000 rpm, it would have bent every single rod. A 112 LSA would have let alot of boost by in the low RPM resulting in alot less cylinder pressures and low end torque, but thats fine cause thats not where the HP is at anyways, its up top. They never even did mention what the torque was, prob because it wasnt very good. Another way to think about it is look at all them ricers with them little 1.6-2.x engines making 600-1000 rwhp, you can make ALOT of HP from small displacement if the torque is kept down. Just my $.02
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2011 | 09:04 AM
  #46  
stock48's Avatar
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 5
From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Default

For me the 110~112 lsa's have always made more power NA, turbocharged, and supercharged.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2011 | 10:00 AM
  #47  
fortplainman's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
From: rochester/ fort plain ny
Default

Originally Posted by Gadgetized
I would love to turbo my truck. hmmm
hey let me know when you go turbo, ill take out a loan and we can both build a kick *** setup lol.

Originally Posted by Atomic
You know theres some smug engineerings over at GM after reading this
rightfully so

I dont understand how 75s took them that far, seems like they would need injectors twice as big...unless they are running 300psi fuel pressure.

hopefully GM is reading that article and throws some turbo's on a forged internal 4.8 that makes 500hp and offers it as a stock alternative with the 6.2 in their trucks lol.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2011 | 02:09 PM
  #48  
schino's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
From: flemington nj
Default

Just my opinion but id think you would toss a rod with 27lbs of boost at 7500rpm easier then you would at mid rpm range
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2011 | 02:43 PM
  #49  
dirty_old_chevy's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by schino
Just my opinion but id think you would toss a rod with 27lbs of boost at 7500rpm easier then you would at mid rpm range
When you toss a rod, it usually happens during the exhaust stroke, because there is next to no pressure pushing on the top of the piston. the piston peaks, wants to keep going. This could result in rod bolts snapping or wrist pins ripping right out of the pistons. With a high boosted application, there is a whole shitton of exhaust to get rid of, so there is more pressure atop the piston during the exhaust stroke, keeping this condition less severe.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2011 | 03:43 PM
  #50  
dirty_old_chevy's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Default

so you would be less likely to throw a rod due to high rpm.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 PM.