why run a MAF???? Why not just go with a Speed Density tune and ditch the MAF??? Nice project

 

Why run speed density when you can run a MAF?

 

I have always been told that SD is easier to tune, and gives you more flexability over a MAF. I know that when you start to make some big power 90% of the guys ditch the MAF

 

I prefer the MAF because this vehicle will be driven all the time. He drives it in condition that range from coastal, mountain and desert. Tuning with the MAF isnt that hard (with alot of help from Crashdummy).

 

where can you get the bolt and spacer from?

 

I am putting together some sets for members doing the conversion (Innovators West 8 Groove Pulley). Give me a call next week.

Joe (760) 522-8669

 

keep me posted on how this works out.Looking like I will be needing some of this for my build up as well (The maf that is),heads look great!Richard really does some great work.WOW thats going to be a great build.
On a side note,engine Dyno'ed the 7.0 yesterday N/A 588hp @ 6000 532tq @ 5400 solid foundation for the up and coming tvs line........

 

Keep posted on the next stage after the 122HH, we plan to do the L92's and 2300 with this vehicle.

 

With my WCCH l92's,and current cam,on this 7.0 combo,I believe that the new TVS2300 may be the way to go,spoke briefly with brian over at magnuson and he believes this as well.The 122HH and the 112 will need to find new homes.

 

Remember that I am running a 3.2 pulley right now on the 122HH and have 15 psi of boost. With the 2.8 pulley it would have been close to 20psi of boost. My engine is a forged 370 and I use the front inlet rear drive setup. The rear is overdriven with the 8" crank pulley which is why I am running a 3.2 up front. The 122HH is a great blower for an engine like mine.

The hard part is going to find drivetrain parts that can survive behind the 2300 at high boost levels. The other big challenge with the 2300 will be supplying the throttle body with enough airflow and fuel needed to support it's power potential.