FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Direct port water meth injection

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 14, 2017 | 11:02 AM
  #11  
Vortec350ss's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,271
Likes: 62
From: South Shore, MA
Default

I agree with the thought of a single or dual nozzle as far from the ports as possible. With air traveling at that velocity with that much heat equal dispersion would be the last of my concerns.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2017 | 04:52 PM
  #12  
MikeGyver's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,515
Likes: 242
From: Suburban Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by thewrx
If that was the case then cars to run straight methanol wouldnt be able to run the amount of timing they do, and no intercooler if no cooling effect was present cause evaporation would still occurr imo.
I never said that port injection would give no cooling. And most of alcohol's ability to withstand more ignition advance in direct port injection comes from its octane rating of 110.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2017 | 04:54 PM
  #13  
MikeGyver's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,515
Likes: 242
From: Suburban Chicago
Default

I guess I implied that it would give no cooling by saying that it would be for fueling only, sorry. I should have said mainly for fueling.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 AM.