FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Building an engine for boost. 5.3 vs 6.0 (800 HP goal)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 9, 2011 | 11:40 AM
  #11  
iregret's Avatar
Thread Starter
Charlie Murphy!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 14
From: Oregon
Default

Why do you prefer the 4.8/5.3 for turbo builds? Better mileage out of boost?
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2011 | 11:45 AM
  #12  
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,265
Likes: 1
From: Lubbock, TX
Default

6.0L block would be the better option in my opinion. The 5.3 just can't take much bore + boost, especially for an 800hp goal. Walls just get too thin. That, coupled with lack of availability for GOOD forged pistons <3.905" makes for a tough build. If you plan to make 800hp, I would stroke a 6.0L block to 408c.i. and work from there. You can get NEW 6.0 blocks for $899 plus freight at this GMPP dealer I know of! They keep them in stock!!
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2011 | 01:01 PM
  #13  
zero2sixT's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 723
Likes: 2
From: Deer park, TX
Default

Originally Posted by iregret
Why do you prefer the 4.8/5.3 for turbo builds? Better mileage out of boost?
Cheaper short blocks would be my reason.

If I was going to replace any internals, it would be the rods and pistons. I'd maybe cut the heads for bigger valves. I'd stick with a trailblazer ss manifold.

My main focus would be on the turbo sizing, boost cam profile, fuel system, and a transmission that can handle the power.

Nothing wrong with shooting for 800 to the wheels. I think you should research was some trucks run with 100-200 rwhp less.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2011 | 02:32 PM
  #14  
TURBHOE's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,318
Likes: 2
From: Jacksonville FL.
Default

Originally Posted by Beau@SDPC
6.0L block would be the better option in my opinion. The 5.3 just can't take much bore + boost, especially for an 800hp goal. Walls just get too thin. That, coupled with lack of availability for GOOD forged pistons <3.905" makes for a tough build. If you plan to make 800hp, I would stroke a 6.0L block to 408c.i. and work from there. You can get NEW 6.0 blocks for $899 plus freight at this GMPP dealer I know of! They keep them in stock!!

why bore it out? wiseco make a piston that is bearly over bored. leaves you with thick walls and smaller motor that loves turbo's. again, you don't HAVE to stroke to get big power. if a 1.6l honda can make 800hp i'm sure a 5.3 can do it too. yes i know they rev to 9000 rpm but with over 3 times the displacement you don't need the rpm.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2011 | 03:04 PM
  #15  
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,265
Likes: 1
From: Lubbock, TX
Default

Originally Posted by TURBHOE
why bore it out? wiseco make a piston that is bearly over bored. leaves you with thick walls and smaller motor that loves turbo's. again, you don't HAVE to stroke to get big power. if a 1.6l honda can make 800hp i'm sure a 5.3 can do it too. yes i know they rev to 9000 rpm but with over 3 times the displacement you don't need the rpm.
You make good points. Boosted applications do love smaller stroke. I must have read through too fast or just assumed he was looking at boring the 5.3, which on a boosted application isn't the best idea, as you could agree. Now with stock cubes, either way would be good route. Cost probably being the deciding factor as 800 boosted fwhp from either block is quite obtainable. Considering cost in this particular case, the $275 5.3 looks to be the better option. I retract my previous statement!
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2011 | 03:43 PM
  #16  
1FastBrick's Avatar
Custm2500's Rude Friend
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,597
Likes: 902
From: JunkYard
Default

Originally Posted by Beau@SDPC
You make good points. Boosted applications do love smaller stroke. I must have read through too fast or just assumed he was looking at boring the 5.3, which on a boosted application isn't the best idea, as you could agree. Now with stock cubes, either way would be good route. Cost probably being the deciding factor as 800 boosted fwhp from either block is quite obtainable. Considering cost in this particular case, the $275 5.3 looks to be the better option. I retract my previous statement!
Not to rub salt in your wounds but Weisco does have off the self forged pistons for th 5.3/4.8 bore size. Certin Sponser cary them in stock. I have had good luck dealing with SDPC while other sponser just want to pimp there products... I will just leave it at that....
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2011 | 03:58 PM
  #17  
02'Z71ONDUBZ''s Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: Tahlequah/Norman, OK
Default

I would buy a 4.8 before considering the 5.3 if you dont need the displacement. The 4.8 is superior to the 5.3 for a turbo app. The question that really needs to answered is what are you going to be using the truck for and how much do you care about your power under the curve. The truck is gonna run hard at wot regardless of what you go with, but the 6.0 will obviously be the more spirited setup for daily driving. Ideally I would like to swap a 6.0 in for my 5.3 in the dd and pick up another rcsb 4.8 to turbo and play with.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2011 | 04:18 PM
  #18  
1FastBrick's Avatar
Custm2500's Rude Friend
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,597
Likes: 902
From: JunkYard
Default

4.8/5.3 are the same bore. They have a different stroke and rod length. The pin height is the same for the piston. The shorter stroke in the 4.8 is what alows it to spool faster.

The Ideal candidate would be an 05 up short block because of the floating Pins and coated side skirts on the pistons.

If some one has a good short block for cheap, I wouldn't pass it up because some said it wasn't the right thing to get.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2011 | 04:26 PM
  #19  
02'Z71ONDUBZ''s Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: Tahlequah/Norman, OK
Default

Originally Posted by 1FastBrick
4.8/5.3 are the same bore. They have a different stroke and rod length. The pin height is the same for the piston. The shorter stroke in the 4.8 is what alows it to spool faster.

The Ideal candidate would be an 05 up short block because of the floating Pins and coated side skirts on the pistons.

If some one has a good short block for cheap, I wouldn't pass it up because some said it wasn't the right thing to get.
Im interested to know how a reduction in displacement increases spool time. Also, I was under the impression that the crank was the difference in the engines not the rods. Regardless, its the difference in piston to rod ratio that makes the 4.8 superior for high boost and resistance to detonation.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2011 | 04:29 PM
  #20  
1FastBrick's Avatar
Custm2500's Rude Friend
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,597
Likes: 902
From: JunkYard
Default

Originally Posted by 02'Z71ONDUBZ'
Im interested to know how a reduction in displacement increases spool time. Also, I was under the impression that the crank was the difference in the engines not the rods. Regardless, its the difference in piston to rod ratio that makes the 4.8 superior for high boost and resistance to detonation.
Give me a second to get the info for you.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 PM.