FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

760/722 Magnacharger?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-31-2006, 07:34 PM
  #21  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
02sierraz71_5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cornelius, NC
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by AintNoHo
Great numbers! Congrats. I'm curious why you chose 10.8:1 @ 9 lbs boost vs something like 8:1 @ 15lbs ? Wouldn't the lower cr make safer boost with more potential? Not argueing just trying to learn.
I want to know too
Old 01-31-2006, 07:46 PM
  #22  
Staging Lane
 
Blown330's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That Eaton R122H is the same as what is on the Shelby GT500. It's a hybrid of the V and not-yet-released VI Gen. Eatons. It's like comparing a IV Gen to a V Gen in terms of how much more efficient it is. The VI Gen is supposed to be roughly the same when compared to the hybrid in terms of efficiency increase. Not quite a twinscrew but it will as good except at very high boost pressures and fatter in the low - mid ranges.
Old 01-31-2006, 08:08 PM
  #23  
what a rush!
iTrader: (8)
 
moregrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 17,610
Received 28 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

btw, that 402 was freakin screamin!



wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!
Old 01-31-2006, 08:12 PM
  #24  
I AM A MOTHERF*CKER
iTrader: (1)
 
TurboBerserker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by AintNoHo
Great numbers! Congrats. I'm curious why you chose 10.8:1 @ 9 lbs boost vs something like 8:1 @ 15lbs ? Wouldn't the lower cr make safer boost with more potential? Not argueing just trying to learn.

That may be the best efficiency range for the blower, and might as well run as much compression as you can get away with.

Nice, nice numbers.
Old 01-31-2006, 08:14 PM
  #25  
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
1slow01Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Ill bite........

What kind of rpms was it turning?
Old 01-31-2006, 08:16 PM
  #26  
blownerator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
BlownChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1986
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 18,745
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blown330
That Eaton R122H is the same as what is on the Shelby GT500. It's a hybrid of the V and not-yet-released VI Gen. Eatons. It's like comparing a IV Gen to a V Gen in terms of how much more efficient it is. The VI Gen is supposed to be roughly the same when compared to the hybrid in terms of efficiency increase. Not quite a twinscrew but it will as good except at very high boost pressures and fatter in the low - mid ranges.

Actually the MP122H (Beta) is close to the same as the blower you mention. This is an Eaton rotating group with a Magnuson designed rotor housing, this housing is still in Beta testing for efficiency and power output. I am not sure when the public will see production.

As for the "110 Octane"......This motor was set up for some testing with an unrelated performance part, Duttweiler decided to test the MP122H (Beta) on the engine while waiting for some other parts to show up. This was tested in these conditions because that is what was there. I suspect that on pump gas this motor would be a solid 700 hp set up no questions asked. You all should know that this new supercharger is not even close to being finished in the design and testing and is already making preliminary numbers that will SHATTER the competition in the same settings. Sooner or later you will have the reliability of the Magnuson/Eaton supercharger with the power output of what was once considered the BIG DOGS. Sorry boys, better get back to the drawing board, Magnuson is coming after you. Let me reiterate, this will be an exciting year for Magnuson Products Inc. and Eaton.
Old 01-31-2006, 08:20 PM
  #27  
blownerator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
BlownChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1986
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 18,745
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
Ill bite........

What kind of rpms was it turning?
Originally Posted by TurboBerserker
That may be the best efficiency range for the blower, and might as well run as much compression as you can get away with.

Nice, nice numbers.


Somthing around 14 or 15K....there is alot left in it.
Old 01-31-2006, 08:21 PM
  #28  
Destroyer of Transmissions
iTrader: (28)
 
1SlowHoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 4,962
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

760 @ 6000rpm
Old 01-31-2006, 08:24 PM
  #29  
blownerator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
BlownChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1986
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 18,745
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SlowHoe
760 @ 6000rpm

and 625 foot pounds at 2500 RPM
Old 01-31-2006, 08:24 PM
  #30  
Destroyer of Transmissions
iTrader: (28)
 
1SlowHoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 4,962
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So should I quit researching Prochargers for my future 408? When is this gonna be available for GenIII motors (stocked & shipped)? You gonna offer a trade in program for your loyal customers?


Quick Reply: 760/722 Magnacharger?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:30 PM.