FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

760/722 Magnacharger?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 31, 2006 | 07:34 PM
  #21  
02sierraz71_5.3's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 1
From: Cornelius, NC
Default

Originally Posted by AintNoHo
Great numbers! Congrats. I'm curious why you chose 10.8:1 @ 9 lbs boost vs something like 8:1 @ 15lbs ? Wouldn't the lower cr make safer boost with more potential? Not argueing just trying to learn.
I want to know too
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2006 | 07:46 PM
  #22  
Blown330's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Default

That Eaton R122H is the same as what is on the Shelby GT500. It's a hybrid of the V and not-yet-released VI Gen. Eatons. It's like comparing a IV Gen to a V Gen in terms of how much more efficient it is. The VI Gen is supposed to be roughly the same when compared to the hybrid in terms of efficiency increase. Not quite a twinscrew but it will as good except at very high boost pressures and fatter in the low - mid ranges.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2006 | 08:08 PM
  #23  
moregrip's Avatar
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

btw, that 402 was freakin screamin!



wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2006 | 08:12 PM
  #24  
TurboBerserker's Avatar
I AM A MOTHERF*CKER
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,132
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by AintNoHo
Great numbers! Congrats. I'm curious why you chose 10.8:1 @ 9 lbs boost vs something like 8:1 @ 15lbs ? Wouldn't the lower cr make safer boost with more potential? Not argueing just trying to learn.

That may be the best efficiency range for the blower, and might as well run as much compression as you can get away with.

Nice, nice numbers.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2006 | 08:14 PM
  #25  
1slow01Z71's Avatar
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

Ill bite........

What kind of rpms was it turning?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2006 | 08:16 PM
  #26  
BlownChevy's Avatar
Thread Starter
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Blown330
That Eaton R122H is the same as what is on the Shelby GT500. It's a hybrid of the V and not-yet-released VI Gen. Eatons. It's like comparing a IV Gen to a V Gen in terms of how much more efficient it is. The VI Gen is supposed to be roughly the same when compared to the hybrid in terms of efficiency increase. Not quite a twinscrew but it will as good except at very high boost pressures and fatter in the low - mid ranges.

Actually the MP122H (Beta) is close to the same as the blower you mention. This is an Eaton rotating group with a Magnuson designed rotor housing, this housing is still in Beta testing for efficiency and power output. I am not sure when the public will see production.

As for the "110 Octane"......This motor was set up for some testing with an unrelated performance part, Duttweiler decided to test the MP122H (Beta) on the engine while waiting for some other parts to show up. This was tested in these conditions because that is what was there. I suspect that on pump gas this motor would be a solid 700 hp set up no questions asked. You all should know that this new supercharger is not even close to being finished in the design and testing and is already making preliminary numbers that will SHATTER the competition in the same settings. Sooner or later you will have the reliability of the Magnuson/Eaton supercharger with the power output of what was once considered the BIG DOGS. Sorry boys, better get back to the drawing board, Magnuson is coming after you. Let me reiterate, this will be an exciting year for Magnuson Products Inc. and Eaton.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2006 | 08:20 PM
  #27  
BlownChevy's Avatar
Thread Starter
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
Ill bite........

What kind of rpms was it turning?
Originally Posted by TurboBerserker
That may be the best efficiency range for the blower, and might as well run as much compression as you can get away with.

Nice, nice numbers.


Somthing around 14 or 15K....there is alot left in it.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2006 | 08:21 PM
  #28  
1SlowHoe's Avatar
Destroyer of Transmissions
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,962
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL
Default

760 @ 6000rpm
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2006 | 08:24 PM
  #29  
BlownChevy's Avatar
Thread Starter
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 1SlowHoe
760 @ 6000rpm

and 625 foot pounds at 2500 RPM
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2006 | 08:24 PM
  #30  
1SlowHoe's Avatar
Destroyer of Transmissions
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,962
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL
Default

So should I quit researching Prochargers for my future 408? When is this gonna be available for GenIII motors (stocked & shipped)? You gonna offer a trade in program for your loyal customers?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 PM.