574rwhp Magnuson "112" using 111LSA cam
09-16-2007, 05:34 PM
#11
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arizona Bay
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by hemidup
A Dana 60 is a very efficient rear end for it's weight. Being strickly a Mopar addict, I can tell you that a Dana 60 weighs, on average, 55lbs more than an 8 3/4" without any loss in et or mph. It's just a whole lot stronger. Also he was running 4.10's not 4.11's
09-16-2007, 08:43 PM
#12
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Who says you can'r run a 111 duration Cam on a FI vehicle?I've gone as low as 110 LSA with very nice results 
I would agree that the Cam listed there is not right for the app. but if you could advance it alot it would pick up alot of midrange.
I would agree that the Cam listed there is not right for the app. but if you could advance it alot it would pick up alot of midrange.
09-17-2007, 12:52 AM
#13
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arizona Bay
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think they'd see a lot of gain with a FI cam, at least not on the top end. I'm will to bet they'd see the same top end, maybe a little less, but way more low end. I had a hotcam (112 LSA) and then switched to an 02 Z06 cam, and that's what my butt dyno experienced.
09-17-2007, 07:33 PM
#14
Adkoonerstrator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Deep in the seedy underworld of Koonerville
Posts: 21,436
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by vanillagorilla
I don't think they'd see a lot of gain with a FI cam, at least not on the top end. I'm will to bet they'd see the same top end, maybe a little less, but way more low end. I had a hotcam (112 LSA) and then switched to an 02 Z06 cam, and that's what my butt dyno experienced.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
