FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

500rwhp/500rwtrq possible

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-31-2009, 05:02 PM
  #31  
TOTM: January 2007
iTrader: (4)
 
Last Call's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,678
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bromaguire
How much meth were you running that will make a big difference in power?
My controller was on 4 out of 10 through an M15 nozzle.

I gained 25 rwhp going from a 3.1 to a 2.9 pulley and alky. For reference, I made:

448rwhp pn 5.5 psi
473rwhp on 8.5 psi and alky
503rwhp w/ 90mm throttle body
513rwhp w/ more tuning

All number above were on a dynojet with 22's.

On the 513rwhp tune, I made 545 rwhp on Synergy's Dynapack without the 22's.
Old 01-01-2010, 08:50 PM
  #32  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
seadoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central, FL
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

im guessing that the GT2-3 would would make a lot more power than say the VHP 210/218 114 with the TVS huh?
Old 01-01-2010, 09:15 PM
  #33  
what a rush!
iTrader: (8)
 
moregrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 17,610
Received 28 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by seadoo
im guessing that the GT2-3 would would make a lot more power than say the VHP 210/218 114 with the TVS huh?
not necessarily, depends on more things than LSA and duration; things like lobe profile, overlap, and valve events play a big role.
Old 01-01-2010, 09:37 PM
  #34  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
seadoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central, FL
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what is your opinion over the Vinci cam and the LPE cam. These are the only specs that I could find on there site.
DUR @ .004" 272*/280*
DUR @ .050" 210*/218*
LIFT .551 / .551
OVERLAP 48*
LSA 114*
Old 01-01-2010, 09:44 PM
  #35  
what a rush!
iTrader: (8)
 
moregrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 17,610
Received 28 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by seadoo
what is your opinion over the Vinci cam and the LPE cam. These are the only specs that I could find on there site.
DUR @ .004" 272*/280*
DUR @ .050" 210*/218*
LIFT .551 / .551
OVERLAP 48*
LSA 114*
I've only had exposure to the LPE GT2-3 Cam first hand; idled smoother than stock on a 5.3L, made over 500rwhp on that same motor with an MP112 Magnacharger blower/headers/90mm TB.

I like Comp Cams XER lobes myself.
Old 01-01-2010, 09:47 PM
  #36  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
seadoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central, FL
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sounds good enough for me! lol
would the L92 heads cause less boost but more power/torque over the 317's?
Old 01-01-2010, 09:59 PM
  #37  
what a rush!
iTrader: (8)
 
moregrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 17,610
Received 28 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by seadoo
sounds good enough for me! lol
would the L92 heads cause less boost but more power/torque over the 317's?
L92's seem to have a few advantages over the cathedral port heads but I don't see why you would need them over 317's to achieve your goals. If you have 317's now I'd just use those, but if you don't have any yet and need to buy some get the L92's.
Old 01-01-2010, 10:09 PM
  #38  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
seadoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central, FL
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thank you moregrip! what would the power range of the GT2-3 cam be on a 6.0? also, the million dollar question... would the larger 2300 be more efficient, cooler and make more power?
when I was talking about 500 mark, that was the min. making more power is always better! LOL just dont want to have to push things to their max to make it.... if that makes since.
Old 01-01-2010, 10:43 PM
  #39  
what a rush!
iTrader: (8)
 
moregrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 17,610
Received 28 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by seadoo
thank you moregrip! what would the power range of the GT2-3 cam be on a 6.0? also, the million dollar question... would the larger 2300 be more efficient, cooler and make more power?
when I was talking about 500 mark, that was the min. making more power is always better! LOL just dont want to have to push things to their max to make it.... if that makes since.
yeah, 500rwhp is alot bro, more than that tranny can take.....GT2-3 works well in a 6L as well

Last edited by moregrip; 01-02-2010 at 07:03 PM.
Old 01-01-2010, 10:49 PM
  #40  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
seadoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central, FL
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know, I am going to take the 700 and put in a 80E



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 AM.