My controller was on 4 out of 10 through an M15 nozzle.

I gained 25 rwhp going from a 3.1 to a 2.9 pulley and alky. For reference, I made:

448rwhp pn 5.5 psi
473rwhp on 8.5 psi and alky
503rwhp w/ 90mm throttle body
513rwhp w/ more tuning

All number above were on a dynojet with 22's.

On the 513rwhp tune, I made 545 rwhp on Synergy's Dynapack without the 22's.

 

im guessing that the GT2-3 would would make a lot more power than say the VHP 210/218 114 with the TVS huh?

 

not necessarily, depends on more things than LSA and duration; things like lobe profile, overlap, and valve events play a big role.

 

what is your opinion over the Vinci cam and the LPE cam. These are the only specs that I could find on there site.
DUR @ .004" 272*/280*
DUR @ .050" 210*/218*
LIFT .551 / .551
OVERLAP 48*
LSA 114*

 

I've only had exposure to the LPE GT2-3 Cam first hand; idled smoother than stock on a 5.3L, made over 500rwhp on that same motor with an MP112 Magnacharger blower/headers/90mm TB.

I like Comp Cams XER lobes myself.

 

sounds good enough for me! lol
would the L92 heads cause less boost but more power/torque over the 317's?

 

L92's seem to have a few advantages over the cathedral port heads but I don't see why you would need them over 317's to achieve your goals. If you have 317's now I'd just use those, but if you don't have any yet and need to buy some get the L92's.

 

thank you moregrip! what would the power range of the GT2-3 cam be on a 6.0? also, the million dollar question... would the larger 2300 be more efficient, cooler and make more power?
when I was talking about 500 mark, that was the min. making more power is always better! LOL just dont want to have to push things to their max to make it.... if that makes since.

 

yeah, 500rwhp is alot bro, more than that tranny can take.....GT2-3 works well in a 6L as well

 

I know, I am going to take the 700 and put in a 80E